Univerisity of Qom Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law 2476-4213 9 4 2023 02 20 A Comparative Study of the bases of Contractual Liability in US law, Iranian law, and Islamic Jurisprudence A Comparative Study of the bases of Contractual Liability in US law, Iranian law, and Islamic Jurisprudence 275 302 2338 10.22091/csiw.2022.7682.2206 FA Faeze Vahed PhD Candidate, Department of Law, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran. 0000-0003-4329-4320 Mojtaba Zahedian Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran. ۰۰۰۰۰۰۳۱۲۶۵۴۱۲۷ Ahmad Taji Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran. ۰۰۰۰۰۰۲۵۸۸۴۷۶۸۰ Journal Article 2021 12 18 The law of contracts is an important part of any legal system. A major challenge in this regard is how sanctions are determined in the event of the breach of a contract. Consistent with a set of pre-determined goals, all legal systems have made certain rules for the breach of contractual obligations. In the law of the United States, a strict liability system governs in terms of preservation of a contract as well as compensations for the damages of a contract breach. Nevertheless, drawing on the different aspects of the consequences of this liability, researchers have developed new perspectives on the fault-based enforcement of liability in recent decades. The Iranian Law, rooted in the Islamic jurisprudence (the Fiqh), limits the claim for contractual damages circumstantially to the affirmation of parties, customary law, or civil laws due to the differing opinions of Islamic jurists (the Foqahā) on the issue. Following the aims of the laws of civil liability in fully compensating for the damages incurred to contract parties, the loss can be estimated according to its attributability to the offending obligator. Use was made of the descriptive, analytical, and comparative methods in carrying out the present study. The law of contracts is an important part of any legal system. A major challenge in this regard is how sanctions are determined in the event of the breach of a contract. Consistent with a set of pre-determined goals, all legal systems have made certain rules for the breach of contractual obligations. In the law of the United States, a strict liability system governs in terms of preservation of a contract as well as compensations for the damages of a contract breach. Nevertheless, drawing on the different aspects of the consequences of this liability, researchers have developed new perspectives on the fault-based enforcement of liability in recent decades. The Iranian Law, rooted in the Islamic jurisprudence (the Fiqh), limits the claim for contractual damages circumstantially to the affirmation of parties, customary law, or civil laws due to the differing opinions of Islamic jurists (the Foqahā) on the issue. Following the aims of the laws of civil liability in fully compensating for the damages incurred to contract parties, the loss can be estimated according to its attributability to the offending obligator. Use was made of the descriptive, analytical, and comparative methods in carrying out the present study.

https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2338_ea87ffb18ac4ce0e031d5e630a074773.pdf