<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The obligation of the contracting party to the inspection of the price and characteristics in a transaction (A comparative study)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The obligation of the contracting party to the inspection of the price and characteristics in a transaction (A comparative study)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>28</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1965</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2021.6994.2095</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Milad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Amiri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Candidate in Private Law, Tarbiat Modares University.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>MohammadBagher</FirstName>
					<LastName>Parsapour</LastName>
<Affiliation>Faculty of Law, University of Tarbiat Modarres</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>To protect the contractor who is unaware of the actual price, defects and characteristics of goods or services, the Law- of contracts- recognizes the right of termination of transaction. But a lack of awareness by the contracting party is sometimes due to ignorance or lack of careful inspection&lt;strong&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;Analyses of legal texts and doctrines indicate that ignorance of the contracting party does not eliminate the possibility of termination which means that the law is rewarding carelessness! However, keeping solidarity of transactions requires that the right of termination not be recognized, in cases where the contracting party does not reasonably examine the actual price, defects and/or characteristics of goods or services before entering into contract. Critically examining the jurisprudential texts and legal approaches of some European countries, the present study sheds light on the duty of the contracting party to investigation prior to entering a contract. Findings revealed that in the legal systems of France and Germany, in cases where the contracting party was able to observe and become aware of the defect, it is not possible to terminate the contract, while in English law the contractor&#039;s negligence will not necessarily deprive him/her of the right to claim deception and therefore to avoid the contract.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">To protect the contractor who is unaware of the actual price, defects and characteristics of goods or services, the Law- of contracts- recognizes the right of termination of transaction. But a lack of awareness by the contracting party is sometimes due to ignorance or lack of careful inspection&lt;strong&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;Analyses of legal texts and doctrines indicate that ignorance of the contracting party does not eliminate the possibility of termination which means that the law is rewarding carelessness! However, keeping solidarity of transactions requires that the right of termination not be recognized, in cases where the contracting party does not reasonably examine the actual price, defects and/or characteristics of goods or services before entering into contract. Critically examining the jurisprudential texts and legal approaches of some European countries, the present study sheds light on the duty of the contracting party to investigation prior to entering a contract. Findings revealed that in the legal systems of France and Germany, in cases where the contracting party was able to observe and become aware of the defect, it is not possible to terminate the contract, while in English law the contractor&#039;s negligence will not necessarily deprive him/her of the right to claim deception and therefore to avoid the contract.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Lesion Option</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">option of defect</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">option of fraud</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">inspection and inquiry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Reasonable Human</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_1965_935ac207e8fb60821c85753e8efa28e4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Islamic and Western Criminal Law Approaches to Rape (A comparative Study)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Islamic and Western Criminal Law Approaches to Rape (A comparative Study)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>29</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>64</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2222</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7612.2191</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammadali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Elahi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student of Fiqh and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Department of Theology, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Heidari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor at the Department of Theology, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohsen</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shekarchizade</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor at the Department of Law, Najaf Abad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najaf Abad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In all human societies, according to the prevailing legal system, criminal or non-criminal measures are proposed as ways to deal with sexual crimes. In Islamic criminal law, unlike the legal systems in Western countries, sexual assault in the context of marital relations between couples, even if it is done without consent, is not considered an example of sexual assault, and the Islamic legislator has not considered such acts as a crime in a marriage. This is the case that in the West, intimacy with the spouse without consent and other examples of sexual violence with a milder degree are predicted and criminalized, and if the sexual act is performed despite the spouse&#039;s lack of consent, it is considered sexual assault in marital relations. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study seeks to answer the problem of how the criminal policy of Islam and the West deal with the phenomenon of sexual assault, which is due to the lack of independent research in the study of this issue in a comparative manner. The results indicate that in both the Islamic and Western systems, significant measures have been adopted in relation to criminal prevention, howerver, in the criminal policy of Islam, in the field of non-criminal prevention, both in terms of social prevention measures and the situation regarding the establishment of rules such as the prohibitions on the secluded intimacy of non-mahram men and women and adornment, along with the encouragement to marriage and the prohibition of celibacy and strictness in marriage, maintaining the necessary distance between men and women in public, facilitating the areas of community participation in criminal response in the field of dealing with sexual assault, such as banning perverts or murdering a stranger in bed, or the mandatory sentence in defense of one&#039;s honor, in addition to the special rules regarding criminal prevention, such as the difficulty of proof, the prohibition of the spread of prostitution, and the public execution of the punishment for the purpose of setting an example, are among the measures that shows the superiority of the criminal system of Islam over the West.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In all human societies, according to the prevailing legal system, criminal or non-criminal measures are proposed as ways to deal with sexual crimes. In Islamic criminal law, unlike the legal systems in Western countries, sexual assault in the context of marital relations between couples, even if it is done without consent, is not considered an example of sexual assault, and the Islamic legislator has not considered such acts as a crime in a marriage. This is the case that in the West, intimacy with the spouse without consent and other examples of sexual violence with a milder degree are predicted and criminalized, and if the sexual act is performed despite the spouse&#039;s lack of consent, it is considered sexual assault in marital relations. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study seeks to answer the problem of how the criminal policy of Islam and the West deal with the phenomenon of sexual assault, which is due to the lack of independent research in the study of this issue in a comparative manner. The results indicate that in both the Islamic and Western systems, significant measures have been adopted in relation to criminal prevention, howerver, in the criminal policy of Islam, in the field of non-criminal prevention, both in terms of social prevention measures and the situation regarding the establishment of rules such as the prohibitions on the secluded intimacy of non-mahram men and women and adornment, along with the encouragement to marriage and the prohibition of celibacy and strictness in marriage, maintaining the necessary distance between men and women in public, facilitating the areas of community participation in criminal response in the field of dealing with sexual assault, such as banning perverts or murdering a stranger in bed, or the mandatory sentence in defense of one&#039;s honor, in addition to the special rules regarding criminal prevention, such as the difficulty of proof, the prohibition of the spread of prostitution, and the public execution of the punishment for the purpose of setting an example, are among the measures that shows the superiority of the criminal system of Islam over the West.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sexual Assault</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Criminal Prevention</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Non-criminal Prevention</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Criminal Policy of Islam</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Criminal Policy of the West</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2222_0edf28df7adffad894c193daa78c610d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Interpretation of General Terms and Emerging Developments; A Comparative Study of Imami Jurisprudence and American Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Interpretation of General Terms and Emerging Developments; A Comparative Study of Imami Jurisprudence and American Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>65</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>94</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2193</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7729.2210</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pourmohammadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Phd Student of Private law</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rahim</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nobahar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>30</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>How do new technologies affect the way we interpret legal texts? This is, on its face, an enormous question. Technology and science are ever-expanding in a rapid pace but, legislatures are often one step behind. This fact raises an important question: How do emerging developments in science and technology affect the way we interpret legal texts? One could fill many volumes in an effort to engage this issue in a serious way. But we can also learn a great deal about the larger subject by asking a more modest question: Can general old terms cover emerging developments that did not exist before? In this article, we, firstly, show applying general terms to emerging developments is an accepted method in Imami jurisprudence and American law. Secondly, a distinction must be made between emerging developments that could not have been dreamed of before or seemed impossible and emerging developments that could have been anticipated by an ordinary man.&lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">How do new technologies affect the way we interpret legal texts? This is, on its face, an enormous question. Technology and science are ever-expanding in a rapid pace but, legislatures are often one step behind. This fact raises an important question: How do emerging developments in science and technology affect the way we interpret legal texts? One could fill many volumes in an effort to engage this issue in a serious way. But we can also learn a great deal about the larger subject by asking a more modest question: Can general old terms cover emerging developments that did not exist before? In this article, we, firstly, show applying general terms to emerging developments is an accepted method in Imami jurisprudence and American law. Secondly, a distinction must be made between emerging developments that could not have been dreamed of before or seemed impossible and emerging developments that could have been anticipated by an ordinary man.&lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">General Terms</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">New Issues</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Judge Scalia</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Textualism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2193_2b398f79caccaa6edb4ec91e99e428f7.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Public Interest Litigation" and Its Role in Fighting Economic Corruption (A Comparative Study of the Iranian, American and English Law)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Public Interest Litigation&quot; and Its Role in Fighting Economic Corruption (A Comparative Study of the Iranian, American and English Law)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>95</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>130</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2036</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2021.7503.2171</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyede Omolbanin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hoseini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom,</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In recent years, legal systems of some countries have emphasized on civil law capacities to fight economic corruption and acquisition of illicit assets. One of the appropriate and necessary actions in this regard is to remove monopoly on the right to sue, especially civil lawsuits (compensation and restitution of public property and assets) exclusive to the government. Some countries have taken effective steps in fighting economic corruption by providing private entities with the authority of suing and consequently, by creating financial incentives. In this case, “public interest litigation” and its specific type known as “Qui-Tam” has been considered in some countries in recent years. The conditions for filing such action and its legal fundamentals in countries which accepted the action and also understanding the Iranian legal principles and formalities are worth studying. The extent to which it is possible to establish or maintain a similar institution in the Iranian law through observance of jurisprudential as well as legal fundamentals and infrastructures is yet to be answered. Employing an analytical-descriptive method, the present study draws on the rules and legal resources of the three countries. Through a meticulous content analysis, attempt is made to extend &quot;Public Interest Litigation&quot; and Qui-Tam in the Iranian law. Findings suggest that lawsuits based on “public interest” could be effective in fighting economic corruption.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">In recent years, legal systems of some countries have emphasized on civil law capacities to fight economic corruption and acquisition of illicit assets. One of the appropriate and necessary actions in this regard is to remove monopoly on the right to sue, especially civil lawsuits (compensation and restitution of public property and assets) exclusive to the government. Some countries have taken effective steps in fighting economic corruption by providing private entities with the authority of suing and consequently, by creating financial incentives. In this case, “public interest litigation” and its specific type known as “Qui-Tam” has been considered in some countries in recent years. The conditions for filing such action and its legal fundamentals in countries which accepted the action and also understanding the Iranian legal principles and formalities are worth studying. The extent to which it is possible to establish or maintain a similar institution in the Iranian law through observance of jurisprudential as well as legal fundamentals and infrastructures is yet to be answered. Employing an analytical-descriptive method, the present study draws on the rules and legal resources of the three countries. Through a meticulous content analysis, attempt is made to extend &quot;Public Interest Litigation&quot; and Qui-Tam in the Iranian law. Findings suggest that lawsuits based on “public interest” could be effective in fighting economic corruption.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Civil society partnership</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">economic corruption</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">public interest litigation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Qui-Tam litigation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2036_a0cff72b67d5afc14db3edebc86ba37a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Right of the Vulnerable to Social Security with Deference to (Inter)National Standards</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Right of the Vulnerable to Social Security with Deference to (Inter)National Standards</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>131</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>170</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2172</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7568.2186</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Latifeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hosseini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeinab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Esmati</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Karaj, Iran,</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The principle of inclusiveness requires that everyone have access to social security- the right to welfare. Yet, there are certain groups who do not have access to it or are treated with discrimination. The present study aims at examining equality in accessing social security- as a human right- for certain vulnerable groups. A use was made of an analytical-descriptive method in studying the current situation of the Iranian social security system in terms of its success in the application of “the principle of equality in social security for certain groups&quot; with deference to human rights criteria. Findings suggest that generalization and spread of social security to all of a society nest serious problems which in turn leave some segments deprived of access to social security. Iran&#039;s legal system of social security should pay special attention to groups that are conventionally in a position of weakness, and the government should establish an efficient system for access to social security for vulnerable people.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The principle of inclusiveness requires that everyone have access to social security- the right to welfare. Yet, there are certain groups who do not have access to it or are treated with discrimination. The present study aims at examining equality in accessing social security- as a human right- for certain vulnerable groups. A use was made of an analytical-descriptive method in studying the current situation of the Iranian social security system in terms of its success in the application of “the principle of equality in social security for certain groups&quot; with deference to human rights criteria. Findings suggest that generalization and spread of social security to all of a society nest serious problems which in turn leave some segments deprived of access to social security. Iran&#039;s legal system of social security should pay special attention to groups that are conventionally in a position of weakness, and the government should establish an efficient system for access to social security for vulnerable people.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">equality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social security</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">insurance system</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">vulnerable groups</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human Rights</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2172_255e9662194de8f5c683bea3d6720896.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A comparative approach to the institutions of appeal in favor of the law and Contrary to the Sharia approach in French and Iranian criminal law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A comparative approach to the institutions of appeal in favor of the law and Contrary to the Sharia approach in French and Iranian criminal law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>171</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>194</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2119</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7131.2116</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ebrahi,</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rezagholizade</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student of criminal lawl and criminology, Department of penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shayganfard</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor, Department of  penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran,</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hamidreza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirzajani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor, Department of  penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>according to the article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2014(1392), the institution of retrial has been envisaged by the head of the judiciary as one of the extraordinary ways to challenge the votes, by recognizing the opposition of the vote to Sharia. The study of French criminal law also shows that the establishment of an appeal in favor of the law is somewhat similar to the institution mentioned in Iranian law. In the meantime, there are various challenges regarding the institution of  against the Shariat, including ambiguity in the criteria for acceptance and the direction of violation of the vote, the competence of the prescribing authority and the quality of its actions. Therefore, in this article, while comparative study of the two institutions, it is tried to identify the shortcomings in the light of conceptual explanation and review the relevant conditions in order to provide a solution to the relevant problems in terms of the desired standards of French law. Accordingly, the findings of this study, which have been obtained in a library and analytical manner, show that both institutions, in terms of the lack of time to submit a request, the ability to apply to all final votes and done through excellent judicial authorities are similar. However, the two establishments are different in terms of their underlying origin, the way they are handled, and the effects on the parties to the case. However, in view of the oversight mission of the Supreme Court, it can be argued that the institution of appeals in favor of the law, if changes are made in accordance with Iranian law, can be a desirable alternative to the institution of against the Shariat.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">according to the article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2014(1392), the institution of retrial has been envisaged by the head of the judiciary as one of the extraordinary ways to challenge the votes, by recognizing the opposition of the vote to Sharia. The study of French criminal law also shows that the establishment of an appeal in favor of the law is somewhat similar to the institution mentioned in Iranian law. In the meantime, there are various challenges regarding the institution of  against the Shariat, including ambiguity in the criteria for acceptance and the direction of violation of the vote, the competence of the prescribing authority and the quality of its actions. Therefore, in this article, while comparative study of the two institutions, it is tried to identify the shortcomings in the light of conceptual explanation and review the relevant conditions in order to provide a solution to the relevant problems in terms of the desired standards of French law. Accordingly, the findings of this study, which have been obtained in a library and analytical manner, show that both institutions, in terms of the lack of time to submit a request, the ability to apply to all final votes and done through excellent judicial authorities are similar. However, the two establishments are different in terms of their underlying origin, the way they are handled, and the effects on the parties to the case. However, in view of the oversight mission of the Supreme Court, it can be argued that the institution of appeals in favor of the law, if changes are made in accordance with Iranian law, can be a desirable alternative to the institution of against the Shariat.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Revision(Retrial)</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Supreme Court</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Head of Judiciary</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Appeal in favor of law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">institution of against the Shariat</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2119_187358f4bf7e5fc3a8dfbefe7ebe28de.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Analysis of Public Rights and Collective Rights from the Perspectives of Islamic and Western Scholars</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Analysis of Public Rights and Collective Rights from the Perspectives of Islamic and Western Scholars</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>195</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>222</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2221</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.8183.2273</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Gholamali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghasemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor, Department of International law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Davoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohebbi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Public law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdolsaeed</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shojaei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph. D. Candidate in Public law, Department of Public law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The institution of public rights is mentioned in Article 156 of the Constitution as one of the major goals of the judiciary in order to realize the rights of the people. There are various aspects to this legal institution including the principles, definition and nature of dissent. The views of Islamic scholars are among the theoretical foundations of the institution of public law. On the other hand, one of the ways to reach a consensus on the institution of public rights is to explain the legal institution similar to collective rights in the sense of &quot;public rights&quot; in international as well as Western views and doctrine. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study draws on the explanation of the views of Islamic and Western thinkers, and seeks to pinpoint the extent of quality and quantity to which the two public rights-collective rights institutions are similar. In this research and in each section, the nature, definition and principles of each of the legal institutions of public rights and collective rights from the perspective of Islamic and Western thinkers have been studied and analyzed. Based on these analyses, it has been determined that based on the reading of the beliefs and ethics of the Islamic Foundation, public rights encompasses a wide range of individual and socialized rights and is more in line with collective rights than the readings of Sharia and jurisprudence based on public rights- which, of course, contains only the socialized individual rights.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The institution of public rights is mentioned in Article 156 of the Constitution as one of the major goals of the judiciary in order to realize the rights of the people. There are various aspects to this legal institution including the principles, definition and nature of dissent. The views of Islamic scholars are among the theoretical foundations of the institution of public law. On the other hand, one of the ways to reach a consensus on the institution of public rights is to explain the legal institution similar to collective rights in the sense of &quot;public rights&quot; in international as well as Western views and doctrine. Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study draws on the explanation of the views of Islamic and Western thinkers, and seeks to pinpoint the extent of quality and quantity to which the two public rights-collective rights institutions are similar. In this research and in each section, the nature, definition and principles of each of the legal institutions of public rights and collective rights from the perspective of Islamic and Western thinkers have been studied and analyzed. Based on these analyses, it has been determined that based on the reading of the beliefs and ethics of the Islamic Foundation, public rights encompasses a wide range of individual and socialized rights and is more in line with collective rights than the readings of Sharia and jurisprudence based on public rights- which, of course, contains only the socialized individual rights.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Public Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Collective Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Individual Rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Socialized Individual Rights</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2221_9c10175c3012de22a5cb6dc8186e9c3f.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Investigation into the Nature and Basis of Contractual Liability; A Comparative Study of Islamic and Western Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An Investigation into the Nature and Basis of Contractual Liability; A Comparative Study of Islamic and Western Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>223</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>256</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2166</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.6881.2071</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahmoud</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kazemi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science; Tehran University.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zarei</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Tehran University, Tehran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Contractual liability in the strict sense of the word is the obligation to compensate for damages arised from breach of contract. The main question is about the nature and basis of this obligation. Shall we consider it as a form of compliance of the contract; meaning that promisor has to give the equivalent of the contract to aggrieved party and perform the contract indirectly; or shall it be considered a separate nature of the contract and as a compensation which is imposed by the law? In the past, western legal systems; specially in France, contended that the claim to compensate for damages is an alternative to the contractual obligation and presumed specific performance. But this view changed, so today, contractual liability like non-contractual liability is considered as a compensatory function, and its basis is considered to be in breach of the contractual obligation so it is separated from the main obligation of the contract. This different view leads to different effects; particularly it denies the the distinction between contractual and non-contractual liability and causes the unification of civil liability. This view corresponds to Islamic law rudiments. It seems that in the Iranian legal system- emanating from Islamic Law, both contractual and non-contractual liability have a same nature and subsequently there is no duality in civil liability. In the present study, we have tried to examine this issue in the Islamic &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; French law. An interpretion of Article 221 of Civil Code concludes our perspective on Iranian law.
 </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Contractual liability in the strict sense of the word is the obligation to compensate for damages arised from breach of contract. The main question is about the nature and basis of this obligation. Shall we consider it as a form of compliance of the contract; meaning that promisor has to give the equivalent of the contract to aggrieved party and perform the contract indirectly; or shall it be considered a separate nature of the contract and as a compensation which is imposed by the law? In the past, western legal systems; specially in France, contended that the claim to compensate for damages is an alternative to the contractual obligation and presumed specific performance. But this view changed, so today, contractual liability like non-contractual liability is considered as a compensatory function, and its basis is considered to be in breach of the contractual obligation so it is separated from the main obligation of the contract. This different view leads to different effects; particularly it denies the the distinction between contractual and non-contractual liability and causes the unification of civil liability. This view corresponds to Islamic law rudiments. It seems that in the Iranian legal system- emanating from Islamic Law, both contractual and non-contractual liability have a same nature and subsequently there is no duality in civil liability. In the present study, we have tried to examine this issue in the Islamic &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; French law. An interpretion of Article 221 of Civil Code concludes our perspective on Iranian law.
 </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Breach of Contract</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contractual Liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Unity of Contractual and Non-contractual Fault</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Article 221 of Civil Code</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2166_56949c1f07bde21fb97c25ee2537d7e6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Investigation into Termination of Contract as a Remedy in Islamic Law and International Documents (A comparative study</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An Investigation into Termination of Contract as a Remedy in Islamic Law and International Documents (A comparative study</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>257</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>286</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2259</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.6323.1968</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Mahdi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Masoumi</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار گروه حقوق واحد کاشان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی کاشان</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Salehimazandarani</LastName>
<Affiliation>associate professor of law at the university of qom</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Termination is one of the remedies, or otherwise said warrants, available to the reprieved party in the event that a contract is breached.  Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study investigates such a remedy as provided in Imamiyah jurisprudence, as well as Iran and international legal documents. The concept is celebrated across the legal systems, yet there are certain differences inherent to it in Islamic law and international documents. Vehemently stipulated in the Imamiyah, it is incumbent upon the obliged party to perform the subject of a contract, hence, a right to termination of the contract is not reserved. Rooted in Imamiyah jurisprudence, Iran’s law of contracts enshrines the performance of the obligation in the first place, and a right to terminate the contract should the possibilities for the coercion upon the obliged party be rare. Contrary to Iran’s law in which the right to termination falls subsequent to performance of an obligation, the two are accessible alongside each other for the obliged party to choose from in the international legal documents. In other words, as for the termination of the contract, there is no need for a request earlier to (non)performance of the obligation.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Termination is one of the remedies, or otherwise said warrants, available to the reprieved party in the event that a contract is breached.  Employing a descriptive-analytical method, the present study investigates such a remedy as provided in Imamiyah jurisprudence, as well as Iran and international legal documents. The concept is celebrated across the legal systems, yet there are certain differences inherent to it in Islamic law and international documents. Vehemently stipulated in the Imamiyah, it is incumbent upon the obliged party to perform the subject of a contract, hence, a right to termination of the contract is not reserved. Rooted in Imamiyah jurisprudence, Iran’s law of contracts enshrines the performance of the obligation in the first place, and a right to terminate the contract should the possibilities for the coercion upon the obliged party be rare. Contrary to Iran’s law in which the right to termination falls subsequent to performance of an obligation, the two are accessible alongside each other for the obliged party to choose from in the international legal documents. In other words, as for the termination of the contract, there is no need for a request earlier to (non)performance of the obligation.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Remedy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Termination of Contract</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Performance of the Obligation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Legal Documents</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Law</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2259_3d79ff86106e16960a15be23322a0a84.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Compliance of the Iranian Oil Industry 2019-Social Responsibility Code with the Jurisprudence and Conventional System of Multinational Companies</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Compliance of the Iranian Oil Industry 2019-Social Responsibility Code with the Jurisprudence and Conventional System of Multinational Companies</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>287</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>320</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2217</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7951.2239</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Sharareh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mofidian</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant professor of private law Department, Faculty of Law, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000000268701554</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>05</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>It is well agreed that &quot;profitability&quot; is a driving force behind all progress. Yet, there are two sides to the coin: (1) increasing competition affects trade competition, quality, transparency, the environment and society in general, and (2) jeopardizes the peaceful coexistence of business and society. Social responsibility holds “give back what you got from people.” In the new social responsibility, society is not only one of the stakeholders but also the main goal. The concept of social responsibility has been emphasized in verses of the Holy Quran and various narrations. In the present study, this issue has been studied in the jurisprudence and practice of transnational companies with a descriptive-analytical method. The study investigates the scope of social responsibility reflected in the regulations approved by the Iranian Oil Industry in 2019 and its regional and thematic scope in accordance with the practice of international transnational companies in the field of responsibility to see if it is social and if the wide range of issues, from health to road construction, etc. are valid only for the territory of Iran. What has been introduced in Iran under social responsibility is that the oil industry is different from the concept, procedure and practical approach of other countries.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">It is well agreed that &quot;profitability&quot; is a driving force behind all progress. Yet, there are two sides to the coin: (1) increasing competition affects trade competition, quality, transparency, the environment and society in general, and (2) jeopardizes the peaceful coexistence of business and society. Social responsibility holds “give back what you got from people.” In the new social responsibility, society is not only one of the stakeholders but also the main goal. The concept of social responsibility has been emphasized in verses of the Holy Quran and various narrations. In the present study, this issue has been studied in the jurisprudence and practice of transnational companies with a descriptive-analytical method. The study investigates the scope of social responsibility reflected in the regulations approved by the Iranian Oil Industry in 2019 and its regional and thematic scope in accordance with the practice of international transnational companies in the field of responsibility to see if it is social and if the wide range of issues, from health to road construction, etc. are valid only for the territory of Iran. What has been introduced in Iran under social responsibility is that the oil industry is different from the concept, procedure and practical approach of other countries.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">corporate social responsibility</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">legal scope</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conflict with the budget system</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">compliance with jurisprudence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">international standards</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2217_f1d39263ddde2e94afab2937c0f2201c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An Analysis of Biological Attack in International Law
(with deference to the Islamic approach)</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An Analysis of Biological Attack in International Law
(with deference to the Islamic approach)</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>321</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>354</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2170</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.7694.2204</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Moslem</FirstName>
					<LastName>Maleki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph. D. in Public International Law, University and Seminary Instructor.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>18</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The cheap and easy technology of biological weapons has become a legitimate threat, now. This is no longer limited to the realm of a scientific mythology, nor is it limited to specific geographical areas. Biological terrorism (bioterrorism) against individuals may cause death, disease, weakness and panic in a society, cause social disruption and become a threat to international peace, security, and public order. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the present study delves into the subject matter of this phenomenon, to express the nature and characteristics of biological attack and then in light of the principles and sources in international law and Islam gives a jurisprudential and legal analysis of biological attack. According to Islamic law and jurisprudence, the tenets of human rights and especially the right to life, and moral values, any biological weapon in any form that targets the innocent and the civilians is not allowed; It is indeed more of a “bloodshed” in that many innocents are killed and is a prototype example of “corruption on Earth” as presumed in Islam.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The cheap and easy technology of biological weapons has become a legitimate threat, now. This is no longer limited to the realm of a scientific mythology, nor is it limited to specific geographical areas. Biological terrorism (bioterrorism) against individuals may cause death, disease, weakness and panic in a society, cause social disruption and become a threat to international peace, security, and public order. Using a descriptive-analytical method, the present study delves into the subject matter of this phenomenon, to express the nature and characteristics of biological attack and then in light of the principles and sources in international law and Islam gives a jurisprudential and legal analysis of biological attack. According to Islamic law and jurisprudence, the tenets of human rights and especially the right to life, and moral values, any biological weapon in any form that targets the innocent and the civilians is not allowed; It is indeed more of a “bloodshed” in that many innocents are killed and is a prototype example of “corruption on Earth” as presumed in Islam.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">biological factors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">biological attack</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">public health</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islam</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">International Law</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2170_744898e35e72041c6dabaed56b6a4319.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Univerisity of Qom</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-4213</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Judicial Review of the Administrative Court of Justice over the Competition Council and Related Institutions</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Judicial Review of the Administrative Court of Justice over the Competition Council and Related Institutions</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>355</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>384</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2277</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22091/csiw.2022.8269.2287</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Nader</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mirzadeh Kouhshahi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>07</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The Iranian Competition Law has been introduced under the General Policy Implementation Law of Article 44  of the Constitution. One of the major issues in competition law is the competition body. There are such institutions in different countries, from countries with a long history of competition law, such as the United States, to countries in the Middle East. In Iran, the Competition Council is the only nationally-recognized authority to review anti-competitive practices and has the authority to make various and important decisions. Because these decisions can seriously affect the rights of stakeholders and economic actors, it is necessary to monitor and control their decisions. Due to its paramount importance and existing disagreement, competence of the Administrative Court of Justice in exercising judicial review over the decisions of the Competition Council and its Appeal Board will be investigated in the present study. The research method is descriptive-analytical. Results of the study indicate that to identify the authority competent to exercise judicial review over the competition council, one should pay attention to the structure and nature of the said council and the type of its decisions. The conclusion of the article is that the Administrative Court of Justice has the authority to exercise judicial review over general decisions, case decisions and the decisions and opinions of the Competition Council in the capacity of dealing with anti-competitive procedures. Moreover, the decisions of the Appeal Board of the Competition Council as well as the decisions and actions of the National Competition Center &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; their officials are subject to judicial review and criminal prosecution of the court.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The Iranian Competition Law has been introduced under the General Policy Implementation Law of Article 44  of the Constitution. One of the major issues in competition law is the competition body. There are such institutions in different countries, from countries with a long history of competition law, such as the United States, to countries in the Middle East. In Iran, the Competition Council is the only nationally-recognized authority to review anti-competitive practices and has the authority to make various and important decisions. Because these decisions can seriously affect the rights of stakeholders and economic actors, it is necessary to monitor and control their decisions. Due to its paramount importance and existing disagreement, competence of the Administrative Court of Justice in exercising judicial review over the decisions of the Competition Council and its Appeal Board will be investigated in the present study. The research method is descriptive-analytical. Results of the study indicate that to identify the authority competent to exercise judicial review over the competition council, one should pay attention to the structure and nature of the said council and the type of its decisions. The conclusion of the article is that the Administrative Court of Justice has the authority to exercise judicial review over general decisions, case decisions and the decisions and opinions of the Competition Council in the capacity of dealing with anti-competitive procedures. Moreover, the decisions of the Appeal Board of the Competition Council as well as the decisions and actions of the National Competition Center &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; their officials are subject to judicial review and criminal prosecution of the court.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">competition law</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Competition Council</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Related institutions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Decisions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Judicial review</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Administrative Court of Justice</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2277_f2d65169bd1a2ef32d0a0f498ebb368c.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
