A comparative approach to the institutions of appeal in favor of the law and Contrary to the Sharia approach in French and Iranian criminal law

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 PhD student of criminal lawl and criminology, Department of penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran,

3 Assistant professor, Department of penal law and criminology, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

according to the article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 2014(1392), the institution of retrial has been envisaged by the head of the judiciary as one of the extraordinary ways to challenge the votes, by recognizing the opposition of the vote to Sharia. The study of French criminal law also shows that the establishment of an appeal in favor of the law is somewhat similar to the institution mentioned in Iranian law. In the meantime, there are various challenges regarding the institution of  against the Shariat, including ambiguity in the criteria for acceptance and the direction of violation of the vote, the competence of the prescribing authority and the quality of its actions. Therefore, in this article, while comparative study of the two institutions, it is tried to identify the shortcomings in the light of conceptual explanation and review the relevant conditions in order to provide a solution to the relevant problems in terms of the desired standards of French law. Accordingly, the findings of this study, which have been obtained in a library and analytical manner, show that both institutions, in terms of the lack of time to submit a request, the ability to apply to all final votes and done through excellent judicial authorities are similar. However, the two establishments are different in terms of their underlying origin, the way they are handled, and the effects on the parties to the case. However, in view of the oversight mission of the Supreme Court, it can be argued that the institution of appeals in favor of the law, if changes are made in accordance with Iranian law, can be a desirable alternative to the institution of against the Shariat.

Keywords

References

  1. آخوندی، محمود، 1394ش، شناسای آیین دادرسی کیفری، تهران، انتشارات دوراندیشان،ج4.
  2. الهام، غلامحسین، 1398ش، «نقض بلا فرجام، بررسی اختیارات رییس قوه قضاییه در نقض آرای قطعی»؛ افق­های نوین حقوق کیفری (مجموعه مقالات نکوداشت دکتر حسین آقایی نیا)، تهران، انتشارات میزان.
  3. پورقهرمانی، بابک، 1394ش، «چالش­های اجرایی تشخیص خلاف شرع بین توسط رییس قوه قضاییه»؛ مجموعه مقالات همایش ملی قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری در بوته نقد، تهران، انتشارات مرکز همایش­های ملی.
  4. ناجی زواره، مرتضی، 1396ش، اعاده دادرسی در امور کیفری- دیباچه آیین دادرسی کیفری، تهران، انتشارات خرسندی.
  5. خالقی، علی، 1399ش، نکته ها در آیین دادرسی کیفری، تهران، موسسه مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهر دانش.
  6. جمعی از پژوهشگران، 1395ش، مشروح مذاکرات شورای نگهبان، تهران، پژوهشکده شورای نگهبان.
  7. رحمدل، منصور،1395ش، «اعتبار امر مختوم»، دو فصلنامه رویه قضایی، ش 1.
  8. فضایلی، مصطفی، 1393ش، «جایگاه اصول دادرسی عادلانه در حقوق بشر و دکترین قضایی اسلام»، فصلنامه پژوهش­های تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، سال اول، ش 1.
  9. Boré, Jean; (2019), La cassation en matière pénale, Paris: Dalloz.
  10. Louic; (2017), L’Organisation interne de la Cour de cassation favorise-t-elle l’élaboration de sa jurisprudence ?, Paris:  Economica.
  11. Canivet, George; (2012) , la procédure d’dmission des pourvois en cassation, Paris: PUF.
  12. Cornu, Gérard; (2019), Dictionnaire Juridique , Paris: PUF.
  13. Guinchard, Serge; (2017), Procédure pénale, Paris: LexisNexis.
  14. Larguier, Jean; 2019, Procédure pénale, Paris: Dalloz.
  15. Mastopoulo, Nerman; 2020, Procédure pénale, Paris: Dalloz.
  16. Pradel, Jean; (2019), Procédure pénale, Paris: Cujas.
  17. Simoneau-fort, Emmanuel; (2004), l'autorité parentale et ses juges, Paris: Litec.

 

Persian references

  1. Akhoundi, Mahmoud; (1394), identification of criminal procedure; Volume 4, Tehran: Durandishan Publications.
  2. Elham, Ghulam Hussain; (1398), "reject without consequence; review of the powers of the head of the judiciary in reject of final decisions"; New Horizons of Criminal Law (Collection of Articles on the Memorialof PhD. Hossein Aghaeinia), Tehran: Mizan Publications.
  3. Pour Qahramani, Babak; (1394), "Executive Challenges of Detection of Sharia Violation by the Head of the Judiciary"; Proceedings of the National Conference on the Code of Criminal Procedure in Criticism. Tehran: National Conference Center Publications.
  4. Naji Zavareh, Morteza; (1396), Retrial on criminal proceedings - Introduction to criminal procedure; Tehran: Khorsandi Publications.
  5. Khaleqi, Ali; (1399), points in the code of criminal procedure; Tehran: Shahr-e-Danesh Institute for Legal Studies and Research.
  6. A group of researchers; (2016), detailed negotiations of the Guardian Council; Tehran: Guardian Council Research Institute.
  7. Rahmadl, Mansour; (2016), "res judicata" ,two quarterly journals of judicial procedure, No. 1.
  8. Fazaili, Mostafa, (2014), "The place of the principles of fair trial in human rights and Islamic judicial doctrine", Journal of comparative studies on Islamic and Western law, First Year, No. 1.

 

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law
Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 33
September 2022
Pages 171-194

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics