Legal Analysis of the Nature of The JCPOA Agreement with regard to the Similar Experiences of North Korea and Iraq

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Author

Faculty Member of the Institution for Research and Development in the Humanities (SAMT)

Abstract

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was concluded between Iran and the so-called 5+1 states in July 2015, and a few days later, it was endorsed by the United Nations Security Council through Resolution 2231. Since then, debates have arisen regarding the legal nature of this agreement. Some argue that the JCPOA is a treaty under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, while the majority believe it is non-binding. One reason supporting the non-binding nature of the JCPOA is its nature and its classification as part of a group of bilateral or multilateral agreements in the field of disarmament in international law. The central question here is: what impact does the nature of this agreement have on the overall approach of the parties involved? So far, the JCPOA has been less frequently analyzed from this perspective. In this article, we examine this feature in the context of the nature of relevant agreements and compare the JCPOA to the denuclearization processes of North Korea and Iraq, which appear to be the most similar in both historical and substantive terms and have, in a way, served as the empirical foundation for the conclusion of the JCPOA.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Persian Sources
Abedini, Abdolah, Mohammadreza Mellat, Masoud Ahsannejad (2019), Iran’s Obligations through Access Regime in the Safeguard Agreement, Additional Protocol, and, JCPOA: a Comparative Approach, journal of Comparative Law, 112(2).
Abolhassan Shirazi, Habibollah, (2015), Anatomy of Nuclear Talks between Iran and America until JCPOA and Adoption of Resolution 2231, Studies of International Relations Journal, 30(2).
Amiri, Mostafa, Habibi, Homayon (2020), Feasibility of JCPOA as a Model for Resolving Nuclear Disputes, Political Science Quarterly, 47(2).
Blix, Hans (2005), Disarming Iraq: The Search for Weapons pf Mass Destruction, M.H Ahoui (Translator), 2nd ed, Tehran, Ettela’at Publication.
Falsasi, Hedayatollah (2003), International Law of Treaties, 2ed ed, Tehran, Nashr Now Publication.
Ghasemi, Gholamali and Abas Iman Eslamiyeh, Production and Use of Ballistic Missiles in International Law and the Defense Doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 9(1).
Mohsen Mohebi and Vahid Bazzar (2018), Dispute Resolution Mechanism on Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and Handle of Iran's Nuclear Sanctions in JCPOA and resolution 2231 Security Council of United Nations, Journal of Legal Studies, 9(4).
Molla Karimi, Omid, Mahmoud Jalali (2016), Nature of “JCPOA” from Perspective of International Law, Public Law Studies Quarterly, 47(1).
Nazif, Mojtaba and Alireza Zaheri (2018), The New Generation of International Agreements: JCPOA, Public Law Research, 58(1).
Sadat Meydani, S.H (2005), Legislative Power of the Security Council, Tehran, Institute for Political and International Studies.
Salehi, Akram, Mohammadreza Dehshiri, Rahmat Hajimineh (2019), The legal-political Nature of the United States Exit of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Journal of Political Strategy, 9(2).
Singh, Sahib (2015), Non-proliferation and Countermeasures, S.R. Rafi’e and Ali Ahadi, in, Iran’s Nuclear Program and International Law, Tehran, Khorsandi Publication.
The Various Aspects of the JCPOA: An Event (2015), Iranian Association for United Nations Studies.
Zamani, S. Ghasem and Masoud Sabour (2021), The UN Security Council Resolution 2231 & Withdrawal of the USA from JCPOA; from Supremacy of the Art. 103 UN Charter up to Diminishing Its Dignity, Journal of Legal Studies, 44(4).
Ziai Bigdeli, M. Reza (2005), The Law of International Treaties, 3th ed, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publication.
 
 
CAPTCHA Image