The Concept and Categories of Damage in Iranian Law, Islamic Jurisprudence, and Common Law

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Author

Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

The proof of legally cognisable damage remains a foundational pillar for the establishment of both tortious and contractual liability. A claimant seeking reparation must adduce credible evidence to substantiate three essential elements: the occurrence and nature of the damage suffered, the wrongful act or omission or breach of contractual obligation giving rise to the claim, and the causal nexus between the defendant's conduct and the loss sustained. Nevertheless, persistent ambiguity surrounding the concept, scope, and classification of damage, particularly within the Iranian legal system, has, in practice, generated significant challenges in the proof of this essential element, thereby undermining the effective protection of injured parties' rights. Adopting a comparative approach, this article examines the concept and categories of damage in three legal systems, Iranian law, Imāmī jurisprudence, and the common law, employing a descriptive-analytical methodology to identify the principal points of convergence and divergence and to advance recommendations for the refinement of the legal framework governing damages in Iranian law. The study finds that, in none of the three systems, has a formal statutory definition of damage been enacted, each having largely confined itself to the enumeration of particular instances. The scholarly definitions that have been proposed converge upon the recognition that damage is a broad, multi-dimensional, and inherently flexible concept, capable of encompassing both material losses, such as the destruction of property or the loss of an accrued benefit, and non-pecuniary losses, such as injury to reputation, dignity, feelings, or the deprivation of legitimate opportunities. In Iranian law, the concept has predominantly been confined to tangible and present financial losses, and the categories thereof are set out in an unsystematic fashion across a disparate array of statutes, resulting in persistent uncertainty regarding the compensability of non-pecuniary harm, future losses, and losses arising from the loss of an opportunity. In Imāmī jurisprudence, although foundational principles such as the rule prohibiting the infliction of harm, causation, and direct destruction form the doctrinal substratum for compensation, theoretical fragmentation has precluded the extraction of a uniform concept. In the common law, by contrast, the concept has been elaborated in a considerably more comprehensive and systematic manner, with express recognition of a wide spectrum of damage types and a sophisticated classification of compensatory remedies. The study concludes that the Iranian legislature should enact a comprehensive statutory definition of damage, accompanied by a clear enumeration of its principal categories, in order to harmonise jurisprudential theory with the statutory framework, to enhance the coherence of judicial practice, and to ensure more effective protection for injured parties in both civil and contractual claims.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

آخوندی، محمد (۱۳۶۷). آیین دادرسی کیفری، جلد ۱، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
آشوری، محمد (۱۳۷۶). آیین دادرسی کیفری، جلد ۱، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات سازمان سمت.
امیری قائم‌مقامی، عبدالمجید (۱۳۵۵). حقوق تعهدات، جلد ۱، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (۱۳۶۷). ترمینولوژی حقوق، چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش.
جبعی عاملی، زین‌الدین (شهید ثانی) (۱۴۰۳ق). الروضة البهیة فی شرح اللمعة الدمشقیة، جلد ۱۰، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
جیلانی، میرزا ابوالقاسم (بی‌تا). جامع الشتات (کتاب طلاق). چاپ سنگی.
حسینی‌مراغی، میر عبدالفتاح (۱۴۱۷ق). العناوین، جلد ۱ و ۲، چاپ اول. قم: مؤسسه نشر اسلامی.
حسینی‌نژاد، حسینقلی (۱۳۷۷). مسئولیت مدنی، چاپ اول. تهران: نشر مجد.
خراسانی، محمدکاظم (بی‌تا). کفایة الأصول، جلد ۲، قم: انتشارات امام المهدی.
سلطانی‌نژاد، هدایت‌الله (۱۳۹۴). بررسی تطبیقی خسارت معنوی، چاپ اول. تهران: میزان دانش.
سلطانی نژاد، هدایت اله (1396). «ایفاء عین تعهد قراردادی و موانع آن در فقه و نظام‌های مختلف حقوقی»، فصلنامه پژوهش تطبیقی اسلام و غرب، دوره 4، شماره 2.
سنهوری، عبدالرازق احمد (۱۹۹۵ م). الوسیط فی شرح القانون المدنی الجدید، جلد ۱، بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
صفایی، سید حسین و قاسم‌زاده، مرتضی (۱۳۷۶). حقوق مدنی (اشخاص و محجورین)، چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (۱۳۷۴). قواعد عمومی قراردادها، جلد ۴، چاپ اول. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (۱۳۷۴). مسئولیت مدنی، جلد ۱، چاپ اول جدید. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
لور راساً، میشل (۱۳۷۵). مسئولیت مدنی، ترجمه: محمد اشتری. چاپ اول. تهران: نشر حقوقدان.
مکاری شیرازی، ناصر (۱۳۸۲ هـ. ق). القواعد الفقهیة، جلد ۱، قم: انتشارات دارالعلم.
نائینی، میرزا حسین (بی‌تا). منیة الطالب، تقریرات: شیخ موسی خونساری، جلد ۲، چاپ سنگی: چاپخانه حیدری.
نراقی، ملأ احمد (۱۴۰۸ق). عوائد الأیام. چاپ سوم، قم: انتشارات بصیرتی.
References
Atiyah, P. S. (2005). Introduction to the law of contract. Oxford University Press.
Beale, H., Bishop, W. D., & Furmston, M. P. (2019). Contract: Cases and materials (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burrows, A. (2019). Remedies for torts and breach of contract (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cheshire, G. C., & Fifoot, H. S. (2017). Law of contract (17th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Clerk, J. F., & Lindsell, W. H. (2023). Torts (24th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Dobbs, D. B. (2018). The law of torts (2nd ed.). West Academic.
Dobbs, D. B., & Roberts, C. L. (2018). Law of remedies: Damages, equity, restitution (3rd ed.). West Academic.
Emerson, R. W. (2016). Business law (6th ed.). Barron’s Educational Series.
Fridman, G. H. L. (1990). Torts (1st ed.). Waterlow Publishers.
Henry, C. (1990). Black’s law dictionary (6th ed.). West Publishing Co.
Hepple, B. A. (1980). Tort: Cases and materials (2nd ed.). Butterworths.
Linden, A. M., & Feldthusen, B. (2022). Canadian tort law (12th ed.). LexisNexis.
Markesinis, B. S., & Deakin, S. F. (2020). Tort law (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
McGregor, H. (2023). Damages (20th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Prosser, W. L. (2020). Handbook of the law of torts (5th ed.). West Publishing.
Stephenson, G. (1996). Source book on torts (1st ed.). Cavendish Publishing.
Street, H. (1962). Principles of the law of damages. Publisher not specified.
Treitel, G. H. (2021). The law of contract and tort interactions. Oxford University Press.
Treitel, G. H. (2025). The law of contract (16th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Tunc, A. (1985). International encyclopedia of comparative law. Publisher not specified.
Weir, T. (2019). Tort law. Oxford University Press.
Winfield, P. H. (2020). A textbook of the law of tort. Sweet & Maxwell.
Winfield, P. H., & Jolowicz, J. A. (2020). Tort (20th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Zamir, E., & Medina, B. (2010). Law, economics, and morality. Oxford University Press.
In Persian
Akhundi, M. (1988). Āyīn-i dādrasī-yi kayfarī [Criminal procedure code] (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Jihād-i Dānishgāhī Publications. [In Persian]
Ashuri, M. (1997). Āyīn-i dādrasī-yi kayfarī [Criminal procedure code] (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Amiri Qāʾim-maqāmī, A. (1976). Ḥuqūq-i taʿahhudāt [Law of obligations] (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Jaʿfarī Langarūdī, M. J. (1988). Tirmīnūlūzhī-yi ḥuqūq [Legal terminology] (1st ed.). Ganj-i Dānish Publications. [In Persian]
Jubaʿī ʿĀmilī, Z. al-Dīn (al-Shahīd al-Thānī). (1982). Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya fī sharḥ al-Lumʿa al-Dimashqiyya [The splendid garden: Commentary on the Damascene gleam] (Vol. 10). Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Persian]
Jīlānī, Mīrzā Abū al-Qāsim. (n.d.). Jāmiʿ al-shatāt (Kitāb-i ṭalāq) [Collector of scattered issues: Book of divorce]. Lithographic print. [In Persian]
Ḥusaynī-Marāghī, Mīr ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ. (1996). Al-ʿAnāwīn [The titles] (Vols. 1–2, 1st ed.). Islamic Publishing Institute. [In Persian]
Ḥusaynīnizhād, Ḥ. (1998). Masʾūliyyat-i madanī [Civil liability] (1st ed.). Majd Publications. [In Persian]
Khurāsānī, M. K. (n.d.). Kifāyat al-uṣūl [Sufficiency in the principles of jurisprudence] (Vol. 2). Imām al-Mahdī Publications. [In Persian]
Sulṭānīnizhād, H. (2015). Barrasī-yi taṭbīqī-yi khasārat-i maʿnawī [A comparative study of moral damages] (1st ed.). Mīzān-i Dānish. [In Persian]
Sulṭānīnizhād, H. (2017). Specific performance of contractual obligations and its impediments in Islamic jurisprudence and different legal systems. Comparative Studies of Islamic and Western Law, 4(2). [In Persian]
Sanhūrī, ʿA. A. (1995). Al-Wasīṭ fī sharḥ al-qānūn al-madanī al-jadīd [The intermediary: Commentary on the new civil code] (Vol. 1). Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī. [In Persian]
Ṣafāʾī, S. Ḥ., & Qāsimzādah, M. (1997). Ḥuqūq-i madanī (ashkhāṣ va maḥjūrīn) [Civil law: Persons and incapacitated persons] (2nd ed.). SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Kātūziyān, N. (1995). Qavāʿid-i ʿumūmī-yi qarārdād-hā [General rules of contracts] (Vol. 4, 1st ed.). Shirkat-i Sihāmī-yi Intishār. [In Persian]
Kātūziyān, N. (1995). Masʾūliyyat-i madanī [Civil liability] (Vol. 1, New 1st ed.). University of Tehran Press. [In Persian]
Lor Rassa, M. (1996). Masʾūliyyat-i madanī [Civil liability] (M. Ashtarī, Trans., 1st ed.). Ḥuqūqdān Publications. [In Persian]
Makārim Shīrāzī, N. (1963). Al-Qawāʿid al-fiqhiyya [Principles of Islamic jurisprudence] (Vol. 1). Dār al-ʿIlm Publications. [In Persian]
Nāʾīnī, M. Ḥ. (n.d.). Munyat al-ṭālib [The aspiration of the seeker] (Taqrīrāt of Shaykh Mūsā Khunsārī, Vol. 2). Ḥaydarī Printing House. [In Persian]
Narāqī, Mullā Aḥmad. (1988). ʿAwāʾid al-ayyām [Benefits of the days] (3rd ed.). Baṣīratī Publications. [In Persian]
 
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics