The Principle of Timeliness in Civil Procedure and the Sanction for Its Violation: Insights from Imāmī Jurisprudence and the European Convention on Human Rights

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law & Political Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Candidate of Private Law, Faculty of Law & Political Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The observance of timeliness in civil proceedings is a crucial element of the right to a fair trial, serving simultaneously the interests of the individual litigant and the broader community. The expeditious conduct of proceedings is recognized as a fundamental human right of such significance that it has been expressly enshrined in numerous national legal systems and international instruments, most notably the European Convention on Human Rights, which enumerates adjudication within a reasonable time among the essential guarantees of a fair hearing. The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights demonstrates that the failure to observe the requirement of a reasonable time engages the international responsibility of the respondent state and gives rise to an obligation to afford just satisfaction, including compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage. In contrast, the Iranian Civil Procedure Code contains no express provision requiring adjudication within a reasonable time, nor does it establish any effective legal sanction for the violation of this requirement, although the concept of timeliness demonstrably underlies a significant number of its provisions. This article undertakes a doctrinal examination of the nature and legal status of timeliness in civil proceedings, drawing upon the normative resources of Imāmī jurisprudence and the comparative model furnished by the European Convention on Human Rights. The study concludes that timeliness cannot properly be characterized as an autonomous legal principle, but rather constitutes one of the fundamental objectives of civil procedure, subordinate to the overriding imperative of qualitative justice. It further argues that the express legislative recognition of the right to adjudication within a reasonable time, coupled with the establishment of an effective mechanism for the compensation of loss occasioned by undue delay, drawing upon the model of the European Convention and the rich tradition of Imāmī jurisprudence, would represent a significant advance in the protection of the procedural rights of litigants within the Iranian legal system.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

قرآن کریم
ابن بابویه، محمد بن علی (1۴13ق). من لا یحضره الفقیه. جلد 3، قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی وابسته به جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم.
جمعی از مؤلفان، (بی‌تا). فقه اهل‌بیت (ع)، قم: مؤسسه دائره‌المعارف فقه اسلامی، جلد 33.
الحر العاملی، محمد بن الحسن (۱۴۲۴ق). وسائل الشیعه. جلد 27، قم: مؤسسه  آل البیت (ع).
حیاتی، علی عباس (1397). «مفهوم اصل حقوقی و مقایسه آن با قاعده حقوقی (مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه)». فصلنامه دانش حقوق مدنی، دوره 7، شماره 2.
صابر، محمود و ناظریان، حسین (1393). «مهلت معقول دادرسی در دیوان کیفری بین‌المللی و آراء دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر». نشریه پژوهش‌های حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 18، شماره ۴.
صادقی، محسن (138۴). اصول حقوقی و جایگاه آن در حقوق موضوعه. چاپ دوم، تهران: نشر میزان.
عمید، حسن (۱۳۵۶). فرهنگ عمید. چاپ دهم، تهران: سازمان چاپ و انتشارات جاویدان.
فضائلی، مصطفی (1393). «جایگاه اصول دادرسی عادلانه در حقوق بشر اسلامی و دکترین قضائی اسلام». فصلنامه پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، سال ۱، شماره 1.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1387). مقدمه علم حقوق و مطالعه در نظام حقوقی ایران. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
الکلینی، محمدبن یعقوب (1387). الکافی-ط دارالحدیث. جلد ۱۴، قم: دارالحدیث.
مافی، همایون و غمیلویی محمد (1398). «مفهوم و ضمانت اجرای «اصول دادرسی» در آیین دادرسی مدنی». فصلنامه تخصصی دانشنامه‌های حقوقی، شماره 3.
المجلسی، الشیخ محمد باقر بن محمدتقی (۱۴۰۴ق). مرآه العقول فی شرح اخبار آل رسول. جلد 3، بی‌جا، دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
محسنی، حسن (1399). اداره جریان دادرسی مدنی. چاپ پنجم، تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
المومن القمی، الشیخ محمد (بی‌تا). مبانی تحریر الوسیله. جلد 1، تهران: مؤسسه  تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی (ره).
References
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (1981). https://au.int/en/treaties/african-charter-human-and-peoples-rights
Amrani-Mekki, S. (2008). Le principe de célérité. Revue française d’administration publique, (125), 43–53.
Apicella v. Italy, App. No. 64890/01 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Mar. 29, 2006). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Calvez, F. (2006). Length of court proceedings in the member states of the Council of Europe based on the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing.
CEPEJ. (2004). Un nouvel objectif pour les systèmes judiciaires: le traitement de chaque affaire dans un délai optimal et prévisible (8e réunion plénière). Council of Europe. https://www.coe.int/t/dg1/legalcooperation/cepej
Dymitruk, M. (2019). The right to a fair trial in automated civil proceedings. Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology, *13*(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2019-1-2
Edel, F. (2007). The length of civil and criminal proceedings in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe Publishing.
European Convention on Human Rights. (1950). https://www.echr.coe.int/european-convention-on-human-rights
European Court of Human Rights. (2021). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a fair trial (civil limb). Council of Europe. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Lechner and Hess v. Austria, App. No. 9316/81 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Apr. 23, 1987). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Lupeni Greek and Others v. Romania, App. No. 76943/11 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Nov. 29, 2016). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Magendie, J.-C. (2004). Célérité et qualité de la justice [Rapport]. Ministère de la Justice, La Documentation française.
Martial Lemoine v. France, App. No. 6583/93 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Nov. 22, 2003). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Martins Moreira v. Portugal, App. No. 11371/85 (Eur. Ct. H.R. Oct. 26, 1988). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng
Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure. (2004). UNIDROIT. https://www.unidroit.org/instruments/civil-procedure/
Rozakis, C. (2004). The right to a fair trial in civil cases. Judicial Studies Institute Journal, *4*(2), 96–106.
Sandra, K. (2013). Completion of criminal proceeding within a reasonable time in Latvia. Baltic International Academy.
Soyer, J.-C., & de Salvia, M. (n.d.). Article 6. In L.-E. Pettiti (Ed.), European Convention on Human Rights: Comment article by article. Economica.
 
In Persian
The Holy Quran.
Al-Kulayni, M. b. Y. (2008). Al-Kafi – Dar al-Hadith edition (Vol. 14). Dar al-Hadith. [In Persian]
Al-Majlisi, M. B. b. M. T. (1982). Mir'at al-'uqul fi sharh akhbar Al-Rasul (Vol. 3). Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah. [In Persian]
Al-Mu'min al-Qummi, M. (n.d.). Mabani tahrir al-wasilah (Vol. 1). Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Persian]
Amid, H. (1977). Amid dictionary (10th ed.). Javidan Publishing House. [In Persian]
Fazaeli, M. (2014). The place of fair trial principles in Islamic human rights and Islamic judicial doctrine. Comparative Research Journal of Islamic and Western Law, 1(1), pp. [In Persian]
Group of Authors. (n.d.). Fiqh-e Ahl al-Bayt (a) (Vol. 33). Institute for the Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence. [In Persian]
Hayati, A. A. (2018). The concept of legal principle and its comparison with legal rule (A comparative study in Iranian and French law). Civil Law Knowledge Journal, 7(2), pp. [In Persian]
Hurr al-Amili, M. b. H. (2003). Wasa'il al-Shi'ah (Vol. 27). Al al-Bayt (a) Institute. [In Persian]
Ibn Babawayh, M. b. A. (1992). Man la yahduruhu al-faqih (Vol. 3). Islamic Publication Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom. [In Persian]
Katouzian, N. (2008). Introduction to the science of law and a study of the Iranian legal system. Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Enteshar. [In Persian]
Mafi, H., & Ghamilouei, M. (2019). The concept and guarantee of enforcement of "procedural principles" in civil procedure. Legal Encyclopedias Quarterly, (3), pp. [In Persian]
Mohseni, H. (2020). Administration of civil proceedings (5th ed.). Sherkat-e Sahami-ye Enteshar. [In Persian]
Saber, M., & Nazerian, H. (2014). Reasonable time of trial in the International Criminal Court and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. Comparative Law Research Journal, 18(4), pp. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, M. (2005). Legal principles and their status in statutory law (2nd ed.). Mizan Publishing. [In Persian]
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics