However, criminal interpretation is regarded as the main factor which makes the courts issue different judgments, the legislator have not defined the nature of interpretation in the law yet. Probably, the lawmaker considers interpretation as a personal matter that each person has his own interpretive method. But the right of appeal against the lower criminal courts to the appeal courts, and making all the courts bound to follow the same judicial precedence by the Supreme Court, show that the criminal interpretation has the general principles. In this article, the author has tried to make clear the criteria and factors of the interpretation. The Muslim legislature should make Islamic penal code according to the belief in the Divine will (monotheism); therefore, similarly the Muslim judge should understand the criminal text in accordance with the desire of God Almighty. Since without understanding the purpose of the lawmaker, the judge may not interpret the text of law, then in his interpretive process, he must rely upon these three elements: the criminal interpretive theory, sources and rules. With the science of interpretation (hermeneutics), the judge can infer the ways of knowledge of legislature`s purposes from the interpretive sources; these ways are the general rules of the linguistics and the special interpretive rules.
مغنیه، محمد جواد،1421ق، فقه الامام الصادق(ع)، قم، مؤسسه الانصاری.
ملکیان، مصطفی،1384ش، تبارشناسی مباحث لفظی علم اصول، مجله نقد و نظر، س10، ش 3 و4.
ـــــــــــــ ،1384ش، جغرافیای دانشهای زبانی، مجله نقد و نظر، س10،ش1و2.
موسوی خمینی، سید روح الله،1421ق، کتاب البیع، تهران، مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر، ج5.
ـــــــــــــــ ،1415ق، انوار الهدایه فی التعلیقه على الکفایه، تهران، مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر چ2.
نجفی، محمد حسن،1404ق، جواهر الکلام فی شرح شرائع الإسلام، بیروت، دار إحیاء التراث العربی، چ7، ج4 و 11.
نصری، عبدالله،1390ش، راز متن: هرمنوتیک، قرائتپذیری متن و منطق فهم دین، تهران، سروش چ2.
هاشمی شاهرودى، سید محمود،1419ق، بایستههاى فقه جزا، تهران، نشر میزان.
واعظی، احمد،1390ش، نظریه تفسیر متن، قم، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
یوهان سون، یورگن دینس و اریک لارسن، سوند،1388ش، نشانهشناسی چیست؟ترجمه علی میرعمادی، تهران، نشر ورجاوند چ2.
یول، جورج،1387ش، کاربردشناسی زبان، ترجمه محمود عموزاده مهدیرجی و منوچهر توانگر، تهران، انتشارات سمت چ3.
Barak, Ahron (2005), Purposive Interpretation In Law, trans. by Sari Bashi, Princeton university press.
Hirsch, E.D. JR.(1967), Validity in interpretation, Newhaven and London, YaleUniversity press.
Encyclopedia Britannica.
Gracia, Jorge J.E.(1990), "Relativism and Interpretation of texts", in Joseph Margolis and Tom Rockmore, Philosophy of Interpretation, Oxford, Blackwell.
Lieber, Fransic (1839), Legal and Political hermeneutics: The principles of interpretation and construction in law and politic, C.C.Little and J. Brown, Boston.
Scott, Jacob (2010), Codified Canons and Common Law of Interpretation, William Colage.
Sharif Bassiouni.M (1982), The Islamic Criminal Justice System, New Yourk, Oceana Publication.
Solen, Lawrance M. (2011), Linguistic Issues In statutory Interpretation, Blooklyn Law School Legal Studies.
Zweigert, Konrad (1998), Introduction to a comparative law, translated by Tony Weir, 3d ed.
Zafari, M. (2015). A Comparative Study of Criminal Interpretive Foundations between Shiite and the Western Law. Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 1(1), 93-127. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.559
MLA
Mohammadreza Zafari. "A Comparative Study of Criminal Interpretive Foundations between Shiite and the Western Law". Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 1, 1, 2015, 93-127. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.559
HARVARD
Zafari, M. (2015). 'A Comparative Study of Criminal Interpretive Foundations between Shiite and the Western Law', Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 1(1), pp. 93-127. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.559
VANCOUVER
Zafari, M. A Comparative Study of Criminal Interpretive Foundations between Shiite and the Western Law. Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 2015; 1(1): 93-127. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.559
Send comment about this article