A Comparative Study of Child Custody After Divorce in Iranian, English, and Canadian Laws

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 PhD student in Private Law, Ayatollah Amoly Branch, Islamic Azad University, Amol, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, West Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22091/csiw.2024.8993.2380

Abstract

Child custody is a significant issue faced by families after divorce in all legal systems. In Iranian law, custody refers to the keeping, care, and regulation of a child's relationships with others, while in Canadian and English law, it encompasses all the rights, duties, powers, responsibilities, and authorities that parents have concerning their child and their property. The crucial question to be addressed is how divorce affects child custody according to the legal systems of Iran, England, and Canada. It appears that while divorce itself does not have a direct impact on the priority of one parent over the other in terms of child custody in Iranian law, the actual determination of custody between the father and mother becomes evident after divorce due to their pre-divorce cohabitation. In Canadian and English law, explicit gender priority in post-divorce custody has largely subsided since the 1970s, with custody laws focusing on an independent assessment of the child's best interests and welfare, thus divorce does not affect the priority of one parent over the other regarding child custody. The research methodology employed in this study is descriptive-analytical and documentary, utilizing a library-based approach. After analyzing the content, the following conclusions were drawn: firstly, it should be noted that Canadian law is similar to English law in most related aspects. Secondly, custody in Iran only encompasses child custody, while in common law, it also includes guardianship and wardship. In common law, both parents can jointly seek custody, and there is no priority between them. The court decides which parent should be responsible for custody based on the child's best interests and welfare. Additionally, the mother's remarriage does not affect custody arrangements. However, in Iranian law, although custody remains with the mother until the child reaches the age of 7, guardianship remains with the father. Anything that endangers the child, such as insanity, leads to the deprivation of custody. Iranian legislation considers the mother's remarriage as a ground for depriving her of custody, but it does not consider the father's remarriage as an effective ground for deprivation. Nevertheless, according to Article 41 of the Law on Family Protection enacted in 2012, the court has the authority to modify or extend custody duration and the custodial parent based on the child's best interests.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Black, J. D., Bridge, J., Bond, T., Gribbin, L., & Reardon, M. (2012). A Practical Approach to Family Law (9th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burton, F. (2010). Family Law. Palgrave.
Civil Marriage Act. (2005). Act current to 2021-08-10 and last amended on 2015-06-18. In Justice Laws Website. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Divorce Act Canada. (1985). Act current to 2021-08-10, last amended on 2021-08-10. In Justice Laws Website. Retrieved from http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
Freeman, M. (2010). Family Values. Palgrave.
Gaffney, R. (2012). Family Law. Oxford University Press.
Herring, J. (2014). Family Law (A Very Short Introduction). Oxford University Press.
Kronby, M. (2010). Canadian Family Law. Wiley.
Mayer, D. (1998). Divorce in Canada. Ottawa, K1A.
Melli, M. S., Brown, P. R., & Cancian, M. (1997). Child Custody in a Changing World: A Study of Post-divorce Arrangements in Wisconsin. U. Ill. L. Rev.
Ministry of the Attorney General. (2012). What You Should Know About Family Law in Ontario. Court Services Division.
Ryan, E. (1995). Divorce in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario.
Ryan, W. F. (2004). The Law Reform Commission of Canada. Ottawa.
Silver, C. (1995). Family Autonomy and the Charter of Rights: Protecting Parental Liberty in a Child-Centered Legal System. Ottawa.
The Law of Succession. (1995). Retrieved from:   
http://www.Londonexternal.ac.uk/currentstudents/programmerresources/laws/subjectguides/succession.shtml
Wallbank, J. (2010). Family Law. Rutledge.
 
Persian and Arabic Sources
Afshar, H. (1379 SH). General Principles of Comparative Law (Vol. 1, Pt. 1). University of Tehran.
Helli, H. i. Y. (1413 AH). Qawaid al-Ahkam fi al-Ma'rifah al-Halal wa al-Haram (Vol. 2). Islamic Publication Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom.
Ibn Manzur, M. i. M. (1408 AH). Lisan al-Arab (Vol. 1, Pt. 3). Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi Publication.
Imami, S. H. (1390 SH). Civil Law (Vol. 9, Pt. 5). Islamic Publications.
Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (1378 SH). Comprehensive Legal Terminology (Vol. 3). Ganj Danesh Publication.
Katouzian, N. (1378 SH). Civil Family Law (Vol. 3). Bahman Barana Publication.
Mo'in, M. (1382 SH). One-Volume Persian Dictionary (Vol. 5). Sarayesh Publication.
Musavi Bojnurdi, S. M. H. (1389 AH). Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyyah (Vol. 3, Pt. 3). Matba'at
al-Adab Publishing.
Safa'i, S. H., & Imami, A. (1369 SH). Family Law (Vol. 1). Tehran University Press.
Shahid Thani, Z. a.-D. (1416 AH). Masalik al-Afham ila Tanqih Sharayi al-Islam (Vol. 2). Islamic Knowledge Institute.
Shiravi, A. H. (1384 SH). Comparative Law (Vol. 1). SAMT Publishing.
 
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law
Volume 10, Issue 4 - Serial Number 38
December 2023
Pages 117-134

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics