Balance of the Interests of the Owner and the Buyer in the Unauthorized Transactions in Iranian Law and Imamiyah Jurisprudence by Comparison with Common Law System

Azizollahi, Mohammad Mahdi; Talabaki, Zeinab

doi:10.22091/csiw.2020.4392.1568

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

¹ Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.

² Ph. D. Candidate in Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom

10.22091/csiw.2020.4392.1568

Abstract

In Iranian Law and Imamiyah jurisprudence there is no strong support for the purchaser in good faith against the owner to the extent that if the transaction is concluded in the presence of the owner but he/she is silent, the transaction needs his/her consent (Article 249) and in this regard, no right is considered for the buyer. While in the Common Law system it is tried to make a balance between the interest of the buyer in good faith and interests of the owner. Therefore, the Common Law system ignores the nemo dat rule that protects the right to ownership of individuals and takes several exceptions in supporting the unauthorized buyer. It appears that Imamiyah jurisprudence has the capacity to make a balance between the interests of the buyer and ones of the owner. It appears that rules such as causation and deception can provide this possibility so that in some cases the owner can make the negligent owner responsible for damages beard by the buyer. Furthermore, invoking these two rules pave the way for changing in view and paying attention to affairs beyond preserving the ownership of individuals.

Keywords

References

1) اردبیلی،احمدبن‌محمد،1403 ق،مجمع الفائده و البرهان فی شرح ارشاد الاذهان،قم،دفتر انتشارات اسلامى وابسته به جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‌،چ1،ج8.

2) افتخار جهرمی،گودرز،1383ش، بررسی قاعده استاپل در حقوق انگلیس و آمریکا،نشریه دفتر خدمات بین‌المللی جمهوری اسلامی ایران،ش 30.

3) انصارى‌ دزفولى،مرتضى بن محمد امین،1415 ق، کتاب المکاسب، قم،کنگره جهانى بزرگداشت شیخ اعظم انصارى،ج3‌.

4) حرّ عاملى،محمد بن حسن‌،1409 ق،وسائل الشیعه،قم،مؤسسه آل البیت(ع)،ج20 و21.

5) حلّی،ابن ادریس،1410ق ، السرائر الحاوی لتحریر الفتاوی.قم،دفتر انتشارات اسلامى وابسته به جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‌،چ2

6) طباطبایى‌ حائرى،سید على بن محمد،1418 ق،ریاض المسائل فی تحقیق الأحکام بالدلائل، قم،مؤسسه آل البیت(ع)،ج16.

7) عاملی حسینی،سید جواد،1419 ق،مفتاح الکرامه فی شرح قواعد العلامه،قم،دفتر انتشارات اسلامى وابسته به جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‌،چ1،ج12.

8) عاملی،محمد بن مکی،شهید اول،1410 ق،اللمعه الدمشقیه فی فقه الامامیه،بیروت،دار التراث- الدار الإسلامیه،چ1.

9) علامه حلّی،حسن بن یوسف،1414ق،تذکره الفقهاء،قم،مؤسسه آل البیت(ع)،چ1،ج10.

10) کلینى،محمد بن یعقوب‌،1407 ق،الکافی،تهران،دار الکتب الإسلامیه‌،ج5.

11) کریمی،عباس،علاء،مهدی،1396ش،«چالش حقوقی معاملات شخص با حسن نیت و راهکار آن»، دو فصلنامه پژوهشنامه حقوق خصوصی عدالت،ش8.

12) محقق حلّی،جعفر بن حسن،1408 ق،شرائع الاسلام فی مسائل الحلال و الحرام،قم،موسسه اسماعلیان،چ2،ج 1 و3.

13) ------------------،1418 ق،المختصر النافع فی فقه الامامیه،قم،موسسه الموطباعات الدینیه،چ6.

14) محقق داماد‌ یزدى،سید مصطفى،1406 ق،‌قواعد فقه‌،مرکز نشر علوم اسلامى‌،چ12‌.

15) محقق سبزواری،محمد باقر،1423 ق،کفایه الاحکام،قم،دفتر انتشارات اسلامى وابسته به جامعه مدرسین حوزه علمیه قم‌،چ1،ج2.

16) مکارم شیرازى،ناصر ،1411 ق، القواعد الفقهیة‌،قم،مدرسه امام امیر المؤمنین(ع)،چ3.

17) موسوى‌خمینى،سید روح الله،بی تا،تحریر الوسیله،قم،مؤسسه مطبوعات دار العلم‌،چ1،ج2.

18) نجفی،محمد حسن،صاحب جواهر،1404 ق،جواهر الکلام فی شرح شرائع الاسلام،بیروت، دار إحیاء التراث العربی‌،چ7،ج37.

19) یزدى،سید محمد کاظم طباطبایى،1421 ق‌،حاشیه المکاسب‌،قم،مؤسسه اسماعیلیان‌،ج1.

20) Baskind, Eric,(2014),Commercial Law Concentrate (transfer of ownership by non-owner),Oxford University Press.

21) Bridge, Michael,(1997),"The Sale of Goods":Oxford University Press.

22) Burrows, Andrew,(2015) Principles of English Commercial Law, Oxford University Press.

23) Clarke, Alison & Paul Kohler,(2006) Property law: commentary and materials, Cambridge University Press,1^st edition.

24) Gilmore, Grant,(1954),"The Commercial Doctrine of Good Faith Purchase" Faculty Scholarship Series.

25) J.E. Sihombing,(1997) Goods: sales and securities, Hong Kong University Press, Third Edition.

26) Kadirgamar,(1959),The Problem Promissory Note: A Question of Estoppel, The Modern Law Review,Vol.22,No.2.

27) Ken, Kanjian,(1976),THE NEMO DAT RULE AND ESTOPPEL BY REPRESENTATION.AND ESTOPPEL BY NEGLIGENCE MQORGATE MERCANTILE CO.LTD. v. TWZTCHINGS, Sydney Law Review, ISSN 0082-0512,Volume 8.

28) Kochan, Donald J,(2016),Dealing with Dirty Deeds: Matching Nemo dat Preferences with Property Law Pragmatism, Kansas Law Review Inc.page2.

29) Salomons, Arthur F,(2009),"Good faith acquisition of movables', TOWARDS A EUROPEAN CIVIL CODE,4th fully Revised and Expanded Edition ,A.S.Hartkamp, M.W.Hesselink, E.H.Hondius, C.E.du Perron and C.Mak, eds.Kluwer Law International, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1515719.

30) Slattery, Emma,(2012),The Nemo Dat Rule: A Balancing Act ,http://www.undergraduatelibrary.org/

31) Yap, Ji Lian, (2008),"Appraising the Market Overt Exception" ,Journal of International Commercial Law and Technology,Vol.3,Issue 4.

Name *

Email Address *

Affiliation *

Comments *

Security Code *

Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law

Balance of the Interests of the Owner and the Buyer in the Unauthorized Transactions in Iranian Law and Imamiyah Jurisprudence by Comparison with Common Law System

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23
March 2020
Pages 241-266

Balance of the Interests of the Owner and the Buyer in the Unauthorized Transactions in Iranian Law and Imamiyah Jurisprudence by Comparison with Common Law System

References

References

Send comment about this article

Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23March 2020Pages 241-266

Volume 7, Issue 1 - Serial Number 23
March 2020
Pages 241-266