Assessing the Possibility of Prosecuting the Assassination of Major General Qassem Soleimani before the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Ph.D. in Public International Law, Allameh Tabataba'i University.

10.22091/csiw.2020.5491.1815

Abstract

The US military operation to assassinate General Soleimani, contrary to its claim, does not comply with the elements and conditions of self-defense and is an internationally wrongful act. The subject of this article is assessing the possibility of prosecution of criminal responsibility and civil responsibility arising from this wrongful act before the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice. Despite Iran and US are not parties to the Statute of International Criminal Court, Iran could create the possibility of exercising jurisdiction by the court over the case through inviting Iraq to accept the ad hoc jurisdiction of the court. But, even in these circumstances, the assassination of General Soleimani cannot be pursued within the framework of one of the four crimes under the jurisdictional of the Court. It is possible to pursue US civil responsibility for this wrongful act by resorting to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons 1973 (1973) to which the Iran and US are the parties. This Convention, which prohibits the commission of certain crimes, including murder, against internationally protected persons, has provided a dispute settlement mechanism that will eventually lead to the International Court of Justice.
 

Keywords

References

1)      بیگ زاده، ابراهیم ، عبداللهی، سیدمحمدعلی،1397ش،موازنۀ آرمان عدالت کیفری و موازین حقوقی: اعمال صلاحیت دیوان بین المللی کیفری نسبت به اتباع دولت های غیرعضو، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، ش84 .
2)      ذاکرحسین، محمدهادی،1398ش، نشست علمی بازخوانی حقوقی پرونده ترور سردار سلیمانی و پیامدهای آن از منظر حقوق بین الملل، تهران، خانه اندیشمندان علوم انسانی، بیست و نهم دی 1398.
3)      عسکری، پوریا ، بذّار، وحید ، خوش لسان، مینو،1396ش،مسئولیت حقوقی بین المللی دولت عربستان در قبال فاجعه منا 1394 و سازوکارهای پیگیری آن، پژوهشنامه حج و زیارت، سال 3، ش 5.
4)      نژندی منش، هیبت‌الله ، بذّار، وحید،1396ش، تکمیلی بودن صلاحیت دیوان بین المللی کیفری و جنایت تجاوز، مجله آموزه های حقوق کیفری، ش 14.
5)      وکیل، امیرساعد،1398ش، نشست تخصصی ترور سپهبد شهید قاسم سلیمانی از منظر حقوق بین الملل، تهران: خانه اندیشمندان علوم انسانی، هجدهم دی 1398.
6)     Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Iraq On the Withdrawal of United States Forces from Iraq and the Organization of Their Activities during Their Temporary Presence in Iraq 2008
7)     Alleged Violations of the Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations, and Consular Rights (Iran v. USA), Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures of 16 July 2018, para. 50.
8)     Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, I.C.J. Reports 2007, para. 137.
9)     Askary, Pouria and Hosseinejad, Katayoun. (2020). “Taking Territory of a Third State Seriously: Beginning of IAC and the Strike Against Major General Soleimani (Part II),” www.opiniojuris.org.
10) Barker, J. Craig. (2011). The Protection of Diplomatic Personnel, Ashgate Publishing.
11) Bowser, Gary and Lev, Yehuda. (2020). “The General is dead - now what? Flash points and Triggers in the Iranian Puzzle,” www.SSRN.com.
12) Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents 1973.
13) Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), Merits, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1949.
14) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 of 25 June 2012, implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1375/2011.
15) ILC Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts 2001.
16) Labuda, Patryk I. (2020). “The Killing of Soleimani, the Use of Force against Iraq and Overlooked Jus Ad Bellum Questions,” www.ejiltalk.org.
17) Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, I.C.J Reports 1996, Advisory Opinion, para. 41.
18) Milanovic, Marko. (2020). “The Soleimani Strike and Self-Defence Against an Imminent Armed Attack,” www.ejiltalk.org.
19) Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, I.C.J. Reports 1986
20) O'Connell, Mary Ellen. (2020). “The Killing of Soleimani and International Law,” www.ejiltalk.org.
21) Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), I.C.J. Reports 2003
22) R v. Donyadideh 114 FLR 43 (1993).
23) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 2001
24) S/RES/1368 (2001), 12 September 2001
 
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics