Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Shiraz.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic and Private law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Shiraz

3 Associate Professor, Department of Islamic and Private law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Shiraz.

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic and Private law, School of Law and political sciences, Shiraz University Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Shiraz.

10.22091/csiw.2021.5499.1817

Abstract

Although the human personality and dignity are respected in all legal systems and under certain conditions, a criminal liability has been determined for damaging it, civil liability caused by damage to personality has been payed less attention especially in Iranian Law. On this basis, the main issue in this article is studying the institution of civil liability, its conditions and criteria and methods of compensation in Iran jurisprudence and law and its comparison with the English Law. The research method is a descriptive-analytic and comparative one. Civil liability caused by damage to personality is studied under the general heading of "desecration" in Imamiyah jurisprudence and Iran law, and under the heading of "defamation" in English law. The criteria for defamation in English law is "lowering the reputation from a right-thinking member view of society" and the criteria for desecration in Iran law and Imamiyah jurisprudence is "damage to the personality". The conditions of liability are different in these systems based on these two criteria. In English law, unlike law of Iran, compensation for defamation is usually financial, the amount of which is determined by the court.

Keywords

  1. Bermingham, Vera; (2005), Tort in a Nutshell, London: Sweet & Maxwell, 7thedition.
  2. Bottner, Gotz; (2001), “Protection of the Honor of Deceased Persons; A Comparison Between the German and the Australian Legal Situations”, Bond Law Review, Vol. 13.
  3. Cooke, John; (2009), Law of Tort, London: Pearson Longman, 9thedition.
  4. Dereyer, E.; (2002), Droit de L'information: Responsabilité pénale des medias, Paris: Litec.
  5. Elliott, Catherine and Frances Quinn; (2009), Tort Law, London: Pearson Longman.
  6. Fleming, J.G.; (1998), The Law of Torts, Sydney: LBC Information Services.
  7. Garner, Bryan A.; (2004), Black's Law Dictionary, Thomson Business.
  8. Glasser Jr, Charles J; (2006), International Libel and Privacy Handbook: A Global Reference for Journalists, Publishers, Webmasters and Lawyers, New York: Bloomberg Press.
  9. Halpern, S.W.; (2000), The Law of Defamation, Privacy, Publicity and Moral Right, Columbus: JPM Books.
  10. Heuston, R.E.V. and R.A. Buckley; (1996), Salmond and Heuston on the Law of Torts, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  11. Koziol, Helmut and Alexander Warzilek; (2005), The Protection of Personality Rights against Invasions by Mass Media, Germany: Springer-Verlag/Wien.
  12. Lehman, Jeffrey; Phelps, Shirelle (eds); (2005), West’s encyclopedia of American law, vol.3, Michigan: Thomson/Gale.
  13. Milmo, P. and V.H. Rogers (eds); (2004), Gatley on Libel and Slander, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  14. Neethling J., J.M. Potgieter and P.J. Visser; (2005), Neethling’s Law of Personality, Durban: Lexis Nexis Butterworths.
  15. Pearson Education; (2000), Longman Handy Learner's Dictionary of American English, London: Pearson Longman.
  16. Rogers, W.V.H. et al. (eds); (2001), Damages for Non-Pecuniary Loss in a Comparative Perspective, Vienna and New York: Springer Verlag.
  17. Rogers, W.V.H.; (2002), Winfield & Jolowicz on Tort, London: Sweet & Maxwell.
  18. Van Gerven, W., J.F. Lever and P. Larouche; (2000), Tort Law, Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  19. Von Bar, C.; (2000), The Common European Law of Torts, vol.2, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Youngs, R.; (1998), English, French and German Comparative Law, London and Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.
CAPTCHA Image