Alternative to Incarceration for Women in the Criminal Justice systems of Iran and Western Countries: With an Approach to Islamic Jurisprudence

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.

2 MA Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.

10.22091/csiw.2022.7494.2169

Abstract

Use of imprisonment as an important sanction in dealing with delinquency in the criminal policy of different countries has not been very successful and this has led to the tendency of legislative and judicial authorities to use its alternatives. Why and how to restrict imprisonment for women is one of the issues that has occupied the minds of thinkers and policymakers at the national and international levels. Research suggests a double necessity using alternatives to incarceration for this group of convicts because their personality and behavior often do not pose a significant danger to others to make their imprisonment necessary. In addition, the punishment of imprisonment not only causes the occurrence and spread of mental illnesses and increases self-harm among them in prison environments that are primarily male in nature, and in practice cannot help their rehabilitation, but also incarceration will increase the risk of delinquency in them and even their children, both inside and outside the prison. Therefore, in the present article which is done by a descriptive-analytical method, it would be clear that the capacity and experience of penal systems both in our country and in the West have shown that alternatives such as self-regulatory penalties, community services and financial penalties, if used accurately and appropriately, can prevent further harm to this important segment of society while preventing the recurrence of crime. A view that is quite consistent with the minimalist approach of Islam in dealing with imprisonment.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. قرآن کریم

    1. ابن بابویه قمی [شیخ صدوق]، محمد بن علی، 1413ق، من لا یحضره الفقیه، قم، دفتر انتشارات اسلامی، چ2، ج4.
    2. ابن سعید حلی، یحیی، 1405ق، الجامع للشرائع، قم، مؤسسه سید الشهداء العلمیه، چ1.
    3. آشوری، محمد، 1394، جایگزین­های زندان یا مجازات­های بینابین، تهران، انتشارات گرایش، چ4.
    4. حسینی شیرازی، سید محمد، بی‌تا، الرسائل الثلاث، بی جا، بی نا، بی چا، ج3.
    5. رهامی، محسن، 1383، عرفی شدن مجازاتها در نظام کیفری جمهوری اسلامی ایران، در: مجموعه مقالات علوم جنایی، تهران، سمت، چ1.
    6. صادقی فسایی، سهیلا و میرحسینی، زهرا ، 1396، «زندگی پس از زندان، چالش های بازسازی برای زنان»، مجله پژوهش های راهبردی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، ش18.
    7. صافی گلپایگانی، لطف الله، بی‌تا، التعزیر: أحکامه و حدوده، قم، نشر مؤلف.
    8. صدر، سید محمد، 1420ق، ماوراء الفقه، بیروت، دار الاضواء للطباعه و النشر و التوزیع، چ1، ج9.
    9. طوسی [شیخ‌الطائفه]، محمدبن حسن،1407ق، تهذیب الأحکام،تهران،دار الکتب الإسلامیه، چ4، ج6.
    10. غلامی، حسین و افضلیان، مینا ، 1389، «رویکرد کیفرشناختی به مبانی و کیفیت توزیع مجازات­ها در کتاب پنجم قانون مجازات اسلامی»، فصلنامه مطالعات پیشگیری از جرم، ش16.
    11. کلینی، أبوجعفر محمد بن یعقوب، 1429ق، الکافی، قم، دارالحدیث للطباعه و النشر، چ1، ج11 و 14.
    12. مکارم شیرازی، ناصر، 1425ق، تعزیر و گستره آن، قم، مدرسه الإمام علی بن أبی طالب علیه‌السلام، چ1.
    13. منتظری، حسین علی، 1409ق، دراسات فی ولایه الفقیه و فقه الدوله الإسلامیه، قم، نشر تفکر، چ2، ج2.
    14. موسوی خوئی، سید ابوالقاسم، 1422ق، مبانی تکمله المنهاج، قم، مؤسسه إحیاء آثار الامام الخوئی ره، چ1، ج42.
    15. هاشمی شاهرودی، سید محمود، 1380، زندان: ضرورت نه مجازات؟، تهران، مرکز مطبوعات و انتشارات معاونت اجتماعی و اطلاع رسانی قوه قضاییه، چ1.
    16. الهام، غلامحسین و برهانی، محسن، 1396، درآمدی بر حقوق جزای عمومی، تهران، نشر میزان، چ3، ج2.
    17. الهام، غلامحسین، 1391، «اعتماد به قاضی تحلیل ماده (728) قانون مجازات اسلامی بر مبنای نظریات فقهی شورای نگهبان»، دیدگاه­های حقوق قضایی، ش57.
    18. African Charter on the Rights of the Child, 1999, available at: <https://www.achpr.org/public/Document/file/English/achpr_instr_charterchild_eng.pdf> (last visited on 6/21/ 2021)
    19. Agosín, Marjorie (2002), Women, Gender, and Human Rights: A Global Perspective, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press.
    20. Albrecht, Hans-Joerg (2012), Prison Overcrowding – Finding Effective Solutions: Strategies and Best Practices Against Overcrowding in Correctional Facilities, Munich, Max Planck Institute.
    21. Ashworth, Andrew (2015), Sentencing and Criminal Justice, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    22. Audi, C.A.F.; Santiago, S.M.; Andrade, M.G.G. and Francisco, P.M.S.B.; (2018), "Common mental disorder among incarcerated women: a study on prevalence and associated factors", Cien Saude Colet, Vol. 23, Issue. 11.
    23. Carlen, Pat (1990), Alternatives to women’s imprisonment, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.
    24. Carlen, Pat and Worrall, Anne (2004), Analysing Women's Imprisonment, Devon,Willan Publishing.
    25. Corabian, Gabriela; Appell, Ronda and Wormith, J. Stephen (2013), Female Offenders and Self-Harm: An Overview of Prevalence and Evidence-Based Approaches, Saskatchewan, Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science and Justice Studies: University of Saskatchewan, available at: <https://cfbsjs.usask.ca/documents/research/research_papers/ReviewOfSelfHarmInWomenOffenders.pdf> (last visited on 6/11/ 2021).
    26. Corston, Jean (2007), The Corston Report: A review of women with particular vulnerabilities in the criminal justice system, London, Home Office (Building A Safe Just And Tolerant Society).
    27. De Cou, Kate. «A gender-wise prison? Opportunities for, and limits to, reform», In: Carlen, Pat (2013). Women and Punishment: The Struggle for Justice, New York, Routledge.
    28. Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, 27 August-7 September 1990, available at: <https://www.unodc.org/documents/congress/Previous_Congresses/8th_Congress_1990/028_ACONF.144.28.Rev.1_Report_Eighth_United_Nations_Congress_on_the_Prevention_of_Crime_and_the_Treatment_of_Offenders.pdf> (last visited on 6/21/ 2021)
    29. Faith, Karlene. «Transformative Justice Versus Re-entrenched Correctionalism: The Canadian Experience», In: Cook, Sandy and Davies, Susanne (1999). Harsh Punishment: International Experiences of Women's Imprisonment, Boston, Northeastern University Press.
    30. Fazel, Seena; Ramesh, Taanvi and Hawton, Keith (2017), "Suicide in prisons: an international study of prevalence and contributory factors", Lancet Psychiatry, Vol. 4, No. 12.
    31. Gonzalez, Patricia; Romero, Tony and Cerbana, Christine B. (2007), "Parent Education Program for Incarcerated Mothers in Colorado", Journal of Correctional Education, Vol. 58, Issue. 4.
    32. Hallevy, Gabriel (2013), The Right to Be Punished: Modern Doctrinal Sentencing, Heidelberg, Springer.
    33. Hawton, Keith; Linsell, Louise; Adeniji, Tunde; Sariaslan, Amir and Fazel, Seena; (2014), "Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: an epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide", The Lancet, Vol. 383, Issue. 9923.
    34. Kottler, Chris; Smith, Jared G. and Bartlett, Annie (2018), "Patterns of violence and self-harm in women prisoners: Characteristics, co-incidence and clinical significance", Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 9.
    35. Lund, Ryan; Hyde, Roberta; Kempson, Diane and Clarke, Pamela (2002), "Women's Needs After Release from Prison to a Rural Community", Journal of Correctional Health Care, Vol. 9, No. 3.
    36. Maruschak, Laura M., Bronson, Jennifer and Alper, Mariel (2021), Bulletin: Survey of Prison Inmates, 2016: Parents in Prison and Their Minor Children (NCJ 252645), United States, U.S. Department of Justice: Bureau of Justice Statistics, available at: <https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/pptmcspi16st.pdf> (last visited on 7/13/ 2021)
    37. Moshenska, Ruby (2013), International good practice: Alternatives to imprisonment for women offenders, The Prison Reform Trust, available at: <http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Women/InternationalGoodPractice.pdf> (last visited on 5/7/ 2021).
    38. Pathways to, conditions and consequences of incarceration for women (Note by the Secretary-General), Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, its Causes and Consequences, 21 August 2013, available at: <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/758207/files/A_68_340-EN.pdf> (last visited on 6/21/ 2021)
    39. Stanton, Ann E; Kako, Peninnah and Sawin, Kathleen J (2016), "Mental Health Issues of Women After Release From Jail and Prison: A Systematic Review", Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 37, No. 5.
    40. The Bangkok Rules: United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders with their Commentary, available at: <https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Bangkok_Rules_ENG_22032015.pdf> (last visited on 6/29/ 2021)
    41. The Council of Europe, Parliamentary Assembly Recommendation 1469, on Mothers and babies in prison, 2000, available at: <http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/xref/xref-xml2html-en.asp?fileid=16821&lang=en> (last visited on 6/30/ 2021)
    42. Teplin, Linda A.; Abram, Karen M. and McClelland, Gary M.; (2018), "Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. I. Pretrial jail detainees", Archives of General Psychiatry, Vol. 53, Issue. 6.
    43. Tonry, Michael (1999), "Community Penalties in The United States", European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Vol. 7, No. 1.
    44. Tonry, Michael (2017), "Community punishments", Reforming criminal justice: A report of the Academy for Justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform, Vol. 4.
    45. Vargés, Etienne (2005), Procédure Pénale, Paris, Lexis Nexi.
    46. Zeng, Zhen and Minton, Todd D. (2021), Bulletin: Jail Inmates in 2019 (NCJ 255608), United States, U.S. Department of Justice: Bureau of Justice Statistics, available at: <https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/ji19.pdf> (last visited on 7/10/ 2021).
CAPTCHA Image