Damages in Lieu of Performance in German and Iranian Law

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Author

Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

"Damages in lieu of performance" is one of the three types of damages for breach of contract provided by the German Civil Code. The main objective of this research is to examine this remedy in German law. Specifically, this study addresses the question of how, in a legal system that upholds the principle of contractual necessity and considers specific performance as the primary remedy for a breach of contract, damages can substitute for the actual fulfillment of the obligation. While the term "damages in lieu of performance" is not explicitly used in Iranian laws, certain instances of this type of damage have been explored in legal literature. By comparing these two concepts within the German and Iranian legal systems, it becomes evident that the German Civil Code provides precise and effective rules governing damages in lieu of performance, thereby offering a solid foundation for the comparative adaptation of such rules in Iranian law.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Gotanda, J. Y. (2006). Damages in Lieu of Performance because of Breach of Contract. Villanova University School of Law, Working Paper Series, 53.
Markesinis, B. S., & Unberath, H. (2002). The German Law of Torts: A Comparative Treatise (4th ed.). Hart Publishing.
Markesinis, B. S., Unberath, H., & Johnston, A. (2006). The German Law of Contract: A Comparative Treatise (2nd ed.). Hart Publishing.
Schlechtriem, P. (2002). The German Act to Modernize the Law of Obligations in the Context of Common Principles and Structures of the Law of Obligations in Europe. Oxford University Comparative Law Forum, 1. Retrieved from https://ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk
The Restatement (Third) of Restitution & Unjust Enrichment.
Treitel, G. H. (1988). Remedies for Breach of Contract. Oxford University Press.
Zimmerman, R. (2002). Breach of Contract and Remedies under the New German Law of Obligations. Roma.
Zimmerman, R. (2005). The New German Law of Obligations: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford Scholarship Online.
 
Persian Sources
Ansari, S. M. (1994). Kitab al-Makasib (Vol. 6). Qom, World Congress of Honoring Sheikh Azam Ansari.
Emami, S. H. (2010). Civil Law (Vols. 1 and 2, 22nd ed.). Tehran, Islamia Publishing House.
Hosseini, M. (2019). Types of damages for breach of contractual obligations and the conditions for claiming them in the German legal system with an overview of the approach of Iranian law. Biannual Contract Law and New Technologies, 1(1), 135-165.
Katouzian, N. (2001). General Rules of Contracts (Vol. 4). Tehran, Enteshar Publishing Company.
Katouzian, N. (2008a). Civil Law, Certain Contracts (Vol. 1, 10th ed.). Tehran, Enteshar Publishing Company.
Katouzian, N. (2008b). General Rules of Contracts (Vol. 5, 5th ed.). Tehran, Enteshar Publishing Company.
Katouzian, N. (2013). Liability for Production Defects. Tehran, Tehran University Press.
Kazemi, M., & Zarei, A. (2022). The Nature and Basis of Contractual Responsibility: Comparative Study of Islamic and French Law. Comparative Studies of Islamic and Western Law, 33(9), 223-256.
Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. (1985). Rules of Islamic Jurisprudence (Vol. 1, 12th ed.). Tehran, Islamic Sciences Publishing Center.
Nematollahi, I. (2017). Triple Benefits in Contractual Damages. Comparative Law Researches, 3.
Ranjbar, M. (2017). Determining Damages for Breach of Contract. Tehran, Mizan Publishing House.
Safai, S. H. (2017). International Sales Law (8th ed.). Tehran, Tehran University Press.
Shahidi, M. (2001). Formation of Contracts and Obligations. Tehran, Majd.
Shahidi, M. (2003). Civil Law 6. Tehran, Majd.
Shahidi, M. (2004). Effects of Contracts and Obligations. Tehran, Majd.
Yazdaniyan, A. (2016). Civil Liability Law: General Rules of Civil Liability. Tehran, Mizan Publishing House.
 
 
CAPTCHA Image