A Comparative Study on the Continuation of Rights after Death and the Viability of Proposing the Theory of the Legal Personality of the Deceased

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 PhD Student of Private Law, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Department of Law, Isfahan University.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University.

Abstract

The concept of "capacity to be entitled" is an essential component of the definition of legal personality. If the law recognizes a "right" for an object or entity other than a living person, it implies the implicit grant of legal personality to that object. In the traditional common law system, death was regarded as the termination of legal personality. However, with advancements in experimental sciences and the emergence of intellectual property rights, the recognition of rights after death gradually gained importance, necessitating the consideration of legal personality after death. These rights include the right to donate body parts, the right to posthumous reproduction and the possibility of assigning a child to a deceased parent, the right to make decisions after death, the right to the integrity of the body, personal rights (privacy) after death, and the right to respect and honor the deceased. Despite the existence of the term "legal personality", Islamic jurisprudence continues to employ concepts and constructs such as capacity, which convey the meaning of legal personality and are applied to issues such as endowments, treasury, and holy places. Therefore, to identify traces of legal personality in Islamic jurisprudence, we must examine its consequences and effects. Jurisprudential recognition of certain rights, such as the right to make decisions after death, the right to inherit the estate (a subject of integrated religion), and the deceased's ownership in the prosecution of crimes against the deceased, indicates the limited survival and inviolability of legal personality after death. These findings rely on the application of Article 956 of the Iranian Civil Code.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Andrew, C. & Shannon, H. (2007). Criminalisation of the violation of a grave and the violation of a dead body. Obiter, 28(1).
Bonginkosi, S. (2018). A Human Rights Analysis of Posthumous Reproduction in South Africa (PhD diss., University of KwaZulu).
Burkdall, L. M. (1995). A Dead Man's Tale: Regulating the Right to Bequeath Sperm in California. Hastings Law Journal, 46(3).
Chesterman, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the limits of legal personality. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(4).
Chu, N. (2015). Protecting Privacy after Death. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 13(2).
Cordelia Mary, T. (2006). A framework for the Collection, retention and use of human body Parts. Victoria University of Wellington.
Edelman, J. (2015). Property Rights to Our Bodies and Their Products. University of Western Australia Law Review, 39.
Elizabeth, A. (2001). Defining the Shape of Australia's Moral Rights: A Review of the New Laws. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 4.
Flori, T. (2017). Posthumous Harm, Punishment and Redemption. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Jefferies, D. E. (1998). The Body as Commodity: The Use of Markets to Cure the Organ Deficit. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5.
Kroon, B., Kroon, F., Holt, S., Wong, B. & Yazdani, A. (2012). Post-Mortem Sperm Retrieval in Australasia. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 52(5).
Lopez, A. B. (2016). Posthumous Privacy, Decedent Intent, and Post-Mortem Access to Digital Assets. George Mason Law Review, 24(1).
Madoff, R. D. (2010). Immortality and the Law: The Rising Power of the American Dead. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Magnusson, R. (1992). The recognition of proprietary rights in human tissue in common law jurisdictions. Melbourne University Law Review, 18.
Matthews, P. (1995). The Man of Property. Medical Law Review, 3(3).
McCutcheon, J. (2016). Dead Loss: Damages for Posthumous Breach of the Moral Right of Integrity. Melbourne University Law Review, 40(1), 240–287.
Nwabueze, R. N. (2002). Biotechnology and the new property regime in human bodies and body parts. Loyola of Los Angeles international and comparative law journal, 24(1).
Peart, N. (2015). Life Beyond Death: Regulating Posthumous Reproduction in New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 46(3), 725-754.
Pierer, J. (2019). Authors’ Moral Rights after Death: The Monistic Model of German Law, Austrian Law and the Revised Berne Convention. University of Vienna Law Review, 3.
Simana, S. (2018). Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 5(2).
Smith Jr, F. O. (2020). The Constitution After Death. Columbia Law Review, 120(6).
Smolensky, K. R. (2009). Rights of the Dead. Hofstra Law Review, 37(3).
Star, B M. (2004). A Matter of Life and Death: Posthumous Conception. Louisiana Law Review, 64(3).
Steinbuch, R. (2009). Kidneys, Cash, and Kashrut: A Legal, Economic, and Religious Analysis of Selling Kidneys. Houston Law Review, 45(5).
White, S. (2000). The Law Relating to Dealing with Dead Bodies. Medical Law International, 4.
Young, H. (2013). The Right to Posthumous Bodily Integrity and Implications of Whose Right it is. Marquette Elder's Advisor, 14(2).
Zhao, B. (2016). Posthumous Defamation and Posthumous Privacy Cases in the Digital Age. Savannah Law Review, 3(1).
Zink, L. (2012). A Framework for Untangling Intents in Posthumous Sperm Extraction. Oklahoma Journal of Law and Technology, 8.
 
Legal Cases
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc., 804 F.3d 202 (2d Cir. 2015).
Broome v. Cassell & Co Ltd [1972] A.C. 1027 (23 February 1972).
California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986).
Commonwealth v. Clap, 4 Mass. 163, 3 Tyng 163 (1808).
Fergerson v. Utilities Elkhorn Coal Co., 313 S.W.2d 395 (Ky. Ct. App. 1958).
Hecht v. Superior Court (Kane), 59 Cal. 2d 222, (Cal. Ct. App. 1996).
Hodel v. Irving, 481 U.S. 704 (1987).
Meskenas v. ACP Publishing Pty Ltd [2006] FMCA 1136.
People v. Baumgartner, 66 P. 974, (Cal. 1901).
S v. Minister for Health (WA) [2008] WASC 262.
Tachiona v. Mugabe, 169 F. Supp. 2d 259 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
Uren v. John Fairfax & Sons Pty Ltd, (1966) 117 CLR 118, [1966] HCA 40.
Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589 (1977).
Williams v. Gaye, 885 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2018).
Young v. That Was the Week That Was, 312 F. Supp. 1337 (N.D. Ohio 1969).
 
Persian Sources
Aghamahdavi, A. T., & Habibian, M. (1393 SH). An Examination of Legal Capacity in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law. Scientific-Terminological Journal of Jurisprudence Research, (2).
Aghanazari, H. (1396 SH). Legal and Jurisprudential Examination of Legal Personality. Journal of Islamic Law, (54).
Akhund Khorasani, M. K. (1413 AH). The Book on Endowment. Qom: Society of Scholars in the Islamic Seminary of Qom, Islamic Publishing Institute.
Alavi Gorgan, M. A. (1391 SH). Method of the Pilgrims. Qom: Hazrat Ayatollah Alavi Gorgan's Office.
Alavi Qazvini, S. A. (1392 SH). The Legal Status of a Debtor's Estate during Liquidation. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Legal Principles, (1).
Ameli, S. T., & Zain al-Din ibn Ali (1414 AH). Hashiyah al-Irsad. Qom: Intisharat Dafater Tablighat.
Ansari, M. I. M. A. (1406 AH). Commentary on Acquisitions (M. K. Akhund Khorasani, Compiler, & M. S. al-Din, Eds.). Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, Printing and Publishing Organization.
Ansari, M. I. M. A. (1411 AH). The Book on Acquisitions (Vol. 1). Qom: Dar al-Dhakhair.
Araki, M. A. (1371 SH). Treatise on Inheritance. Qom: Dar Rah-e Haq Institute.
Asadi, B. (1399 SH). Legal Analysis of the Nature and Necessity of Legal Personality. Law Research Quarterly, (10).
Ashtiani, M. H. (1425 AH). The Book on Judiciary. Qom: Al-Ash'tiani International Congress (Late).
Ganbari Rabati, S., & Fallah, A. A. (1393 SH). Legal Personality in Islamic Jurisprudence and Law. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Foundations of Law, 6(19).
Ghabouli Dar Afshan, S. M. M., & Ghabouli Darafshan, S. M. H. (1392 SH). Jurisprudential and Legal Analysis of the Estate After the Death of the Testator. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law, 7.
Gholamali Zadeh Kaju, M., & Rezaei, I. (1399 SH). Legal Personality of the Embryo: A Study of International and National Management, Accounting, and Legal Studies. In Second International and National Conference on Management, Accounting, and Law Studies.
Golpayegani, S. M. R. M. (1413 AH). Al-Qada' wa al-Shahadat. Qom: Al-Haqaiq.
Golpayegani, S. M. R. M. (1413 AH). Hidayat al-'Ibad. Qom: Dar al-Quran al-Karim.
Habiba, S., & Shakouri, Z. (1390 SH). Compulsory Transfer of Intellectual Property. Comparative Law Journal, (1).
Hakim, S. M., Kazem, M. A. Y., & Asif Mohseni, M. (1382 SH). Fundamental and Jurisprudential Rules of Possession (M. N. Shahroodi, Ed.). Qom: Payam Mehr.
Har Ameli, M. I. H. (1416 AH). Elaboration of the Means of Sharia to Acquire Sharia Issues. Qom: Al al-Bayt Institute for the Revival of Heritage.
Helli, I. A., Mohammad, M. I. M. A. (1410 AH). The Secret Treasures for Clarifying Fatwas. Qom: Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Society of Teachers of the Qom Seminary.
Imammi, S. H. (1356 SH). Civil Law (6th ed.). Tehran: Islamiye.
Javanmardi, N., Nazari, V. (1395 SH). Will and Inheritance in Relation to Material Rights of Literary and Artistic Works. Private Law Research Quarterly, (16).
Karbasi, M. I. A. (1431 AH). Al-Irth fi al-Fiqh al-Ja'fari. Beirut: Al-A'lamy Institute for Publications.
Kashif al-Ghata', H. I. J. (1422 AH). Anwar al-Fiqhah, Kitab al-Mirath. Najaf: Kashif al-Ghata' Institute.
Khoi, S. A. (1417 AH). Masbah al-Fiqhah (Old Edition). Qom: Ansarian.
Khoi, S. A. (1430 AH). Encyclopedia of Imam Khoi. Qom: Ahya Athar al-Imam al-Khoi Institute.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1422 AH). Important Jurisprudential Research. Qom: Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School Publications.
Makarem Shirazi, N. (1427 AH). New Fatwas. Qom: Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib School Publications.
Mashhadi, A., & Jalili Morad, A. (1394 SH). The Influence of Legal Thoughts on the Formation of Constitutional Law in Islamic and Western Jurisprudence with an Emphasis on the Thoughts of Martyr Beheshti. Comparative Research on Islamic and Western Law, 2(4).
Meshkini, M. A., & Ahmadi Jalvayi, H. (1392 SH). Fiqh Terminology. Qom: Dar al-Hadith
al-Ilmiyyah wal-Thaqafiyyah, Center for Printing and Publishing.
Mohaddi Lenkorani, M. F. (1427 AH). Physicians and Patients' Rules. Qom: Imamate Ahl
al-Bayt Jurisprudence Center.
Mohaqeq Damad, M., & Mehrayar, M. (1399 SH). Legal Personality of Zakat in the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Its Relationship with the Public Treasury. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Legal Principles, 2.
Mortazavi, S. Z. (1395 SH). Legal Personality and Competence of the State in Jurisprudence. Specialized Journal of Religion and Law, 14.
Najaf Abadi, H. A. M., & Bita. (Vol. 3). Resaleh Istiftaat (Montazeri).
Nakhai Pour, G., & Saeedi, M. A. (1398 SH). Rational Considerations in Analyzing the Foundations of Legal Personality. Principles of Civil Jurisprudence, 19.
Qasemzadeh, S. M., & Sangtarash, F. (1395 SH). Legal Nature of the Laboratory Embryo. Journal of Private Law Research, 5(17).
Rajabi, A. (1398 SH). Guarantee in Artificial Intelligence. Comparative Law Studies, (2).
Rajaei, F., Mohaqeq-Damad, S. M., Musavi, S. M. S., & Mohamadi, S. M. (1390 SH). A Jurisprudential and Legal Examination of the Relationship between Human Beings and Their Body Parts. Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research, (2).
Rashti, H. A. (1401 SH). Kitab al-Qadha (Book on Judiciary). Qom: Dar al-Quran al-Karim.
Rohani, M. (1429 AH). Minhaj al-Fiqhah. Qom: Anwar al-Huda.
Sahib Jawahir, M. H. B. B. (1417 AH). Mu'jam al-Fiqh al-Jawahir (Encyclopedia of Jurisprudence) (Vol. 2). Beirut: Markaz al-Ghadir lil-Dirasat al-Islamiyyah.
Saimari, M. B. H. (1420 AH). Ghayat al-Muram fi Sharh Sharayi' al-Islam (Commentary on the Laws of Islam). Beirut: Dar al-Hadi.
Samani, E. (1394 SH). A Jurisprudential and Legal Examination of Endowment. Tehran: Majd.
Shahid Thani, Z. A. (1410 AH). Al-Rawdah al-Bahiyyah fi Sharh al-Lum'ah al-Damashqiyyah (Commentary on Al-Lum'ah al-Damashqiyyah). M. Kalantar (Ed.). Beirut: Maktabat
al-Dawari.
Tabataba'i Hakim, M. S. (1428 AH). Al-Ahkam al-Fiqhiyyah. Najaf: Dar al-Hilal.
Tabatabai Qomi, T. (1425 AH). Masbah al-Nasak fi Sharh al-Manasak. G. Silavi (Ed.). Qom: Mahlati.
Tarhini Ameli, M. H. (1385 SH). The Jurisprudential Essence in Explaining the Brilliant Garden. Qom: Dar al-Fiqh for Printing and Publishing.
Tusi, A. J., & Mohammad ibn Hasan (1407 AH). Tahdhib al-Ahkam. Tehran: Dar al-Kutub
al-Islamiyyah.
Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics