A comparative perspective on the geometric morphology of legal rules in Iran

Document Type : Academicm and Research

Authors

1 Department of Public Law, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Law Department, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.

10.22091/csiw.2025.10528.2517

Abstract

Legal norms lead to the emergence of a coherent legal system when their value and validity are the result of an ultimate and superior legal rule. The main purpose of this study is to explain and explain the legal rules at various levels of the hierarchy of the Islamic Republic of Iran's legal norms and comparative comparison of this legal system with the legal pyramid in the Hans Kelsen drawing theory. This article, which is done by comparative comparison, will determine that issues and facts such as "the possibility of identifying legal norms superior to the constitution according to the type and nature of the Iranian political system", "predicting the same rules And with the constitution, "and" the unpleasant phenomenon of regulatory tours in the legal system of the country "has led to the emergence of a rare form of geometric composition (hyperglycry cool) giant from legal order in Iran. The geometrical shackle of the Iranian legal system has led to a calcium legal pyramid. On the other hand, with the adverse phenomenon of the law of laws on the lower domains of the Iranian legal system and its unstoppableness, the cause of these distinctions and differences in the two legal order. That is.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Send comment about this article
CAPTCHA Image
Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 24 February 2025

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics