نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دکتری تخصصی فقه و حقوق،دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران شمال،تهران،ایران
2 دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد واحد تهران مرکز،تهران،ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Judgment in Iranian law will be civil if the perpetrator commits a mistake or unconventional negligence by refusing to hear the case, but if he makes a mistake, he will be responsible for compensating the government. The purpose of the comparative study of the present study is to clarify the commonalities and differences between the two schools of Imamiyah jurisprudence and the common law system, which has been done in an analytical-descriptive manner and with a library method, and the findings indicate this. In addition to Constitution 171 of the Constitution, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran recognizes relative immunity under the influence of Imamiyah jurisprudence in order to protect the independence of the judge. They knew absolutely. In general, by anticipating the principles of ethics to monitor the misconduct of the judiciary along with appealing their decision to the extent that the US government believes in the principle of "exercise of sovereignty" is derived from the federal system, refrain from making decisions. in America. He was acquitted and the judiciary in this country, by insuring itself, found a certain limit for possible problems.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله