نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی، گروه حقوق عمومی و بین‌الملل، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه قم، قم، ایران.
3 استادیار گروه حقوق، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Government transition is a critical process in any democratic system, during which a portion of the country's political power held by the executive branch is transferred from the outgoing government—whose legal term is approaching its end—to the newly elected administration. This process varies across legal systems and can lead to different effects and consequences. In Iran, the government transition process is often accompanied by election-related political tension, managerial demotivation due to the nearing end of appointments, inadequate and delayed service delivery by civil servants due to uncertainty and weak supervision, and other factors. As a result, the principle of continuity of public services is disrupted, leading to public dissatisfaction and uncertainty. Using a descriptive-analytical method and through a comparative analysis of the legal frameworks governing government transition in Iran and the United States, this research seeks to answer the following question: What solutions and procedures has the American legal system adopted for optimal government transition, and can they be applied to improve and mitigate the challenges of this process within Iran’s legal system? The findings reveal the existence of a specific legal framework for government transition in the United States and highlight the necessity of enacting a comprehensive, public-law-oriented statute in Iran. Such a law should regulate the entire process—starting from the informal announcement of presidential candidacy to the appointment of various government officials—in a structured and systematic manner.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله