نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانش آموخته دکتری حقوق خصوصی، دانشکده حقوق ، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
3 مدرس مدعو دانشگاه علوم قضائی وخدمات اداری،تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
As one of the most important vertical restrictions with specific features, exclusive transactions significantly affect competition and consumer welfare in product, technologyand innovation markets. Due to their anti-competitive consequences, these restrictive procedures are among the challenging issues in the field of competition law. Therefore, this article seeks an answer to the question of whether exclusive transactions necessarily violate competition law or imply favorable economic and competitive consequences. In the present article, an attempt has been made to analyze the position of Iran's competition law by studying the legal approaches of the US and the European Union while explaining the position of exclusive transactions in non-competitive relationships in the three markets of products, technologyand innovation, using a descriptive and analytical way. findings of the comparative study show that this restrictive procedure in the competition laws of US & the European Union is evaluated by the new situation in the field of innovation and technology according to certain criteria and the rule of reason is usually applied to evaluate these limitations and rule of absolute prohibition is used only in exceptional cases and in the case that exclusive transactions are seriously disruptive to competition, in Iran's competition laws, there is no explicit reference to it and the dimensions of these restrictions are unclear, these restrictions can be briefly inferred from several clauses of Article 45 of the Law on Implementing General Policies of Principle (44) of the Constitution. it is suggested to amend the legal provisions and develop the exemption regulations .
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله