نوع مقاله : علمی و پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract
In every financial or non-financial actions concerning children, legal parents are bound to observe their child’s prudence. But, "prudence" concept is ambiguous in all legal systems in order to be accommodative in various conditions. This ambiguity can be appeared in the legislative, judicial and executive fields and provoke the assessing of the prudence not be in certain standards. This issue is vital specially in determining the child's prudence ambits as a main element of his right. Hence, for reducing of this vast irregularity, we have represented in this article some elementary solutions by analyzing Iranian legal system, based on Imamieh Feqh and jurisprudence, and also United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, based on the general comments of the Child’s Rights Committee and have made an essay to find some major criteria for assessing of child's "prudence". So, in this research some conceptual distinctions between prudence and similar concepts and also some examples of procedural and substantive norms for its instance determining are suggested.
کلیدواژهها [English]
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله